We know the Democrats are guilty of heinous crimes. We knew they had no choice but to cheat. But we apparently had apparatuses set up to catch them cheat, not stop them from cheating.

Think about how the narrative was going: we didn't cheat last time but the Republicans were going to cheat this time.

Had we stopped their cheat, this would be narrative.

I would rather catch them cheating, then stop them from cheating, and be called the cheaters.

Now we have Twitter, where we can pass the evidence of cheating far and wide as it trickles (or floods) out.

Had the red wave happened, how do we keep the narrative that they cheated going?

But if they cheat again, and we have proof, and we now have the means of disseminating that proof...

Chess, not checkers.

If you did your job yesterday and voted, you did your job. Had you not voted they wouldn't have had to cheat. You did though, and so they did, and so we can catch them. I know it's exhausting, but this game has to be played right. We're bringing down the Dragon. When Trump said "I caught them all, I caught the swamp" he was speaking prophetically. I think he saw the future, and spoke in past tense in that way. We had to catch the swamp in the act, not stop them. It's easier to convict someone of murder than attempted murder.

Again, the goal was not to stop the cheat, but record the cheat.

Even if we don't end up with the House and the subpoena power that comes with it, we should have Space Force, National Guard, etc. with all the info they need to step in.

We did our job yesterday. Our job today and moving forward will be to disseminate the information. I don't think we have to wait much longer for justice to come. But we may have to, so the best we can do is stay calm, pray, and don't let negativity kill our energy. We're told to enjoy the show, not get too emotionally wrapped up in it.

NCSWIC.

Good night.

Elon is constantly saying he believes we're living in a simulation. If we're watching a movie, is not a movie a simulation?

Got me thinking. Not sure if there's anything here--I'm not very autistic but I was an English major and I love seeing connections between languages, words, and meaing, so this is where my mind went. Maybe someone else can find something.

Elon - Hebrew name meaning Oak Tree

Musk - Literally means ball sack lol

Anagrams:

Leon - Also means Lion

Lone - Now the sole/lone owner/operator of Twitter?

Neo L - Neo lives in the Matrix, a movie about us living in a simulation. L could be the roman numeral for 50. Not sure if 50 means anything but Neo is also an anagram for One so...

One L - In roman numerals IL is 49. This will sound funny, but the San Francisco (where Elon built Tesla and bought Twitter) 49ers just acquired CHRISTIAN Mccaffery. A Heisman winning Stanford (bay area) graduate who just came home to the Bay Area a week and a half ago in a trade from Carolina. He helped the 49ers beat the Los Angeles Rams (blue and yellow--same colors as Ukraine, many thought their Super Bowl win last year was a kind of comms) by 17 points (31-14) in a come from behind win this past Sunday by posting just the 4th football hat trick (3 touchdowns - one passing, one receiving, one rushing) in NFL history. Trump just retruthed a meme yesterday of 3 pictures of himself that says the storm is coming). The 49ers are red and gold (red wave? gold shall destroy the fed?) and are named the 49ers because of the California gold rush.

Maybe nothing, but I've always theorized that the Q team had a Quantum AI (Elon always talks about AI's--seems obsessed with them) that could see the future. Almost feels like this was seen/planned, but who knows. The player's name IS Christian, and the 49ers, despite being 4-4 are suddenly favorites to beat the currently undefeated (iron?) Eagles (Iron Eagles-Nazi symbol) to win the NFC and go to the Super Bowl (go on youtube and you'll see this is suddenly the near consensus among football pundits around the country--kind of strange for a 4-4 team to suddenly get that kind of hype).

Elon in Gematria is 445 (45?)

Anyway, just some thoughts.

I realize I'm datefagging. But don't you feel this? You know that horrible feeling of waiting that we've all had for so long, how it just disappeared over the past few days after the Twitter sale? When does a bird sing? We know Trump won't be the one who posts that. That feeling. How on earth was the "My fellow Americans" speech ever going to see the light of day until now?

I just...man, I really hope tomorrow is the day.

Been giving this some thought. Why would Q feel the need to tell us to trust them if they weren't going to do anything that looked like a betrayal?

He never said "Trust DeSantis." Why would he? DeSantis is doing everything we feel like Trump would do if Trump were Governor of Florida.

I see so many people saying "See? Q is a liar. He said we could trust those guys!"

Well no, he TOLD us to trust those guys. Why would we need to unless they were going to do things that were seemingly not in our favor?

"It is my understanding that the First Amendment provides no restrictions on what I'm allowed to question publicly or privately."

He literally doesn't have to say anything else.

I spent a lot of time the past couple of days looking at the sky from my wife's hospital room (just had a new baby boy). I can see the planes moving in the sky but they're not leaving anything behind them. It was 4 o'clock in the afternoon when I really noticed. The sky had been crystal clear all day. Anybody else noticing whether they've been there or not where you live?

When trying to persuade others there are two venues:

1. Privately
2. Publicly

If you genuinely care about persuading the person you are talking to, you should never attempt to do so with others present. Not even one other person.

Direct persuasion must be done privately as your main opponent is not the intellect of the other individual, but their ego.

And not just their ego, but your own. It has been said that to change a man's mind you must first convince him that you are truly his friend.

A friend is someone who loves you unconditionally and does not need you to see things the way they do in order to remain their friend.

Your chief goal when trying direct, private persuasion should be a genuine loving connection, and that genuine loving connection should shine as the utmost goal of the conversation.

You must be ok with them seeing things differently. You must be willing to listen actively--meaning listen intently to what they're saying, and repeat back what they're saying in your own words until they are satisfied you have understood their perspective genuinely and they grow quiet in anticipation of your reply.

You must never say "I understand, but." Never. You must SHOW them you understand via active listening. This may seem tedious at first, but you'd be surprised, it's actually the fastest way from point A to point B.

You must also never scoff at their words, roll your eyes, or do anything at all that seems to imply that you do not have the utmost respect both for their intelligence, and their character.

It goes a long, long way to preface nearly EVERYTHING you say with something along the lines of "Before I say this, I just want to make sure you know that this is just what I think right now. I admit the possibility that I may be wrong, and I don't expect you to see it the same way, and if you don't, I'm perfectly fine with that. I'll explain as much as you want, but if you want me to stop and explain something a little more in depth I'm happy to do that. I just want to make sure that you know that my relationship with you is more important to me than being right, and if you have a different perspective on it that you want to share, I promise this is a safe space where you'll be heard" or some form of that at least.

Then, when presenting your ideas, never use absolute statements. Preface answering each question with things like "I know I could be wrong, but it seems to me that..."

It also helps to draw on things you know they already feel or believe to draw comparisons, but again, always be ready to soften it with qualifying statements to prove that you're not set in your way of thinking and are still open to changing your mind, and be ready to admit that the comparison is not perfect, only helpful to your purpose of helping them to understand you.

"To make friends, shew thyself friendly."

If you want to inspire open-mindedness, shew thyself open-minded.

Do not bother telling people you are open-minded, just like you shouldn't bother telling them you understand. Show them via your conversation that you are, in fact, open-minded. And that you are not, in fact, a threat.

It also helps to never suggest there is something you have known for a long time that they were unaware of. If they're unaware of something, it helps to let them know that up until just recently, so were you, or that you had learned it long ago but had forgotten it but something recently had just reminded you of it.

This helps them to avoid feeling uninformed, and thus foolish and defensive.

Statements like "You know, I always thought that too. It seemed perfectly reasonable to me for the longest time. And I don't know, that still might be the case but here is something I found/heard/saw/read/thought of recently that has me thinking otherwise..."

Ask yourselves, do I love the person I'm trying to persuade? Do I love them enough to try my very best not to trigger their ego? Am I willing to be patient and kind and express clearly that my good relationship with them is the most important thing?

If you can answer yes to those questions, then by all means, make the attempt. And may God be with you. But if not, I don't recommend going there. If pride, not love, is your main goal. If saving the country and the world is more important to you than making them feel loved, I say you're not ready yet. You're better off working on loving that person more first. Serving them. Being with them. Then when you know you could suppress your ego, feel free to go there.

Now, there IS a place for public persuasion, and it's called debate.

And I do NOT recommend engaging in it with someone you love. Ever.

Granted, you should love everyone, but we know that's not possible and seeing that public debate is a great way to persuade, you should not shy away from it.

That said, when you debate publically, you must realize who it is you are trying to persuade, and it's not the person you're debating.

In Arthur Schopenhauer's book "The Art of Controversy" he explains that it is not the person you're debating you should seek to persuade, because the presence of an audience and the effect that has on both your ego and that of your opponent, makes the task too difficult.

No, in public debate, your target is not your opponent, but the audience itself.

The goal in public debate, quite simply, is to "come off better."

What does that mean?

Simply put, it means to never seem frazzled or exasperated, or upset. You should at all times seem cool as a cucumber. Never show emotion, if you can help it.

Certainly no negative emotion, but also, never laugh at an opponent's remark, no matter how ridiculous, or even how funny it is.

Laughing shows weakness, nerves, and a lack of focus, even when you're trying to act as if you're laughing because the other person said something ridiculous. It doesn't work, and neither does smiling.

Think of Hillary Clinton cackling on that stage as GEOTUS circled her like a hungry lion during his debates with her with that permanent scowl etched on his face.

It signals submission, and all that matters in a debate is what you SIGNAL. If you want a master class in public debate you need look no further than Donald John Trump, the greatest debater of our lifetimes (until his debate with Biden--which I believe he threw on purpose as part of the plan). Jordan Peterson has also become wonderful at this over the past few years, and so has that Crowder guy from Louder with Crowder (although you'll notice with Crowder, that even though he's in public, he usually brings them to his table under a tent with a tiny bit more privacy, and he's really good flattering people, joking with people, and getting them to feel safe admitting they've been wrong in some way. He could be more careful but he's really coming along, I have to admit).

The winners of debates are not those with the best ideas, but rather, those who come off the most confident, the most witty, and frankly, the most smug.

Like it or not, this wins the audience. Because the audience isn't looking to be lectured or persuaded or taught. They are looking to be ENTERTAINED.

Admit it or not they are there to see a FIGHT. They love the tension inherent in any form of direct confrontation, be if verbal or physical, and how they determine the winner of the fight is by who sweats the least, by who makes them laugh, by who makes their opponent throw their hands up in exasperation (think Jeb Bush throwing up his hands, rolling his eyes, and exposing his weak neck for Donald to take a bite out of--didn't play too well, did it?).

The goal of public debate, quite simply, is to make the other person look stupid and feel out of control. Thus, any tactic you care to call upon is fair game, as far as the crowd is concerned.

Name calling ("Little Marco", "Crooked Hilllary"), logical fallacies, crude jokes, you name it. If you get the audience laughing, if it has them on the edge of their seats, you're already ten steps ahead.

This is why the meme war is so important. "We meme them until they cry, and then we make memes about them crying." Memes are effective simply because...they are funny.

And if you're smart, the best memes will not be pointed at the audience you are trying to persuade (i.e. self-called "liberals" or "democrats" or "normies") but at their "leaders."

See, they can choose to reject a leader, but they'll never reject themselves. Such is the ego.

So don't attack them. Attack Biden. Attack Kamala. Attack AOC. Attack the FBI. Attack the Federal Reserve, the CDC, etc.

Because run of the mill Democrats can actually find some of those jabs funny. And it can start to drive a wedge between them and their leaders.

But if you attack them, well...imagine if Trump had called the audience fat during his debates rather than making them laugh with fat jokes about Rosie O'Donnell.

Imagine if he attacked Marco Rubio's supporters, as opposed to Marco Rubio. Or the supporters of any of his other primary opponents in 2016.

Would that have worked?

How well has Hillary calling you "deplorables" and Brandon calling you "terrorists" worked on you? Had the opposite effect, huh?

I would encourage every meme maker and spreader here to consider that moving forward.

Think of who you're trying to persuade. Attack their leaders, not them. And soon they'll be ashamed to be associated with them, and will quietly move to the fun side.

Our side.

Anyway, that's most of what I know about persuasion. At least that I can think of right now. I wanted to share. Perhaps some of you mind find it useful.

WWG1WGA

We all know this scripture. And we all know the common interpretation of the events that transpired. Peter swore to Christ he would never turn his back on him, and Jesus basically scoffed at his claim, prophesying that Peter would in fact deny him three times before the morning arrived. Upon finding himself doing so, Peter wept bitterly, we assume because of the regret he felt.

I have a different take on this scripture. I think Peter proved throughout his entire life that he was not afraid to stand up for what he felt was right. He wasn't afraid of anyone or anything. His name was Simon, but Christ called him Petra/Peter, meaning Rock. I think when he told Christ he would not abandon him, he meant it. After all, when the soldiers came for Jesus in Gethsemane, who drew his sword and swiped off the ear of one of the soldiers? Peter. He was ready to die for Jesus right then and there.

No I don't think Christ was scoffing at Peter and telling him about his weakness. I think Jesus issued the words "thou shalt deny me three times" as a commandment of sorts. Not to mock his strength or zealotry, but to test his humility. I think Jesus gave Peter the hardest commandment he'd ever been given up until that point in his life--to swallow his pride, and for the good of Christ's church and his mission and his plan, to embrace doing what Peter felt went against every fiber of his being. To deny confederacy with his teacher, his savior, and best friend.

"Wept bitterly." I think about that a lot. Think about what Peter saw during his time with Jesus. First, the miracle of the fish on the other side of the boat that almost sank his vessel. Then the miracle of turning water to wine at a wedding feast. Feeding thousands with a few fish and five loaves of bread. Calming a storm with a few words. Watching him heal the sick, the lame, the blind, the deaf, and even raising the dead. At one point during all of this, Peter's faith grew so strong that he himself walked on water for a moment after seeing Jesus do it. Peter was a rock. I don't believe for a second that he REALLY turned his back on Jesus. I think he was commanded to. And I think that final test is what prepared him to go unflinchingly into the world afterward and proclaim the Gospel as the head of the church and work similar miracles of his own.

Maybe some of you can see where I'm going with this.

That's right. I'm not ready to write off Mike Pence just yet. I'm not ready to write off Wray and Sessions and Bill Barr yet either ("trust Wray", "trust Sessions", "trust Barr"). We don't know the whole story yet. Sure, on the outside they appear to have stabbed Trump in the back, to have denied him three times, to have sold him out for bag of silver. And maybe that's exactly what they did.

But maybe not. I'm not ready to bury anyone yet until this all shakes out. Until I know the whole story, I'm keeping an open mind. Disinformation is necessary, after all. Just like Trump and the vaccine--which feels like clever doublespeak that will be made clear in time, I can't help wondering how many moving parts this plan had, how many actors, and how many patriots were asked to do things they hated to have to do by Trump and/or Q et al, in order to push the plan forward to its ultimate conclusion. Things are not always what they seem at first. We may come to praise these men yet. Who knows. Maybe Christ, like Trump, had a little Sun Tzu in him. And maybe Pence, like Peter, was just the perfect man for the job.

Driving to the gym this morning and this Uhaul style small moving truck pulls up next to me. White male, late forties, short cropped hair, slightly overweight. The truck was all yellow but had "DEVL" painted on the side in graffiti style lettering.

Green light and his lane moves a little faster than mind so I think "Is that a business?" and check for the license plate. No license plate. "No license plate? Is that normal?"

He keeps going straight and I merge onto the freeway and it's just bugging me. Do I call 911 just in case? And say what? That I have a weird feeling? I live in a very religious area with very low crime where I'm sure cops are afraid to profile people and here I am asking myself if that's all I'm doing. I try to find a reasonable explanation why a man that age would be driving a truck like that with no plates and no business insignia aside from the letters "DEVL" painted on the side in teenager-vibe graffiti style and I just can't square it.

I get to the gym parking lot but I can't get out of the car I just kept thinking "What if?" I can feel the tug of war going on inside. Do I trust my instincts or explain them away? I look up "DEVL" and "DEVL moving trucks" online and don't see anything. So I think "What's the worst that will happen if I'm wrong and I report this guy? He gets pulled over there's a good explanation for why he doesn't have a plate and everything checks out and he thinks 'Hey, if I don't want to get pulled over maybe I shouldn't drive around in an unlicensed truck with the word "DEVL" on the side?

Eh. So I call. What the hell. The guy should expect this, right? If he wants to have an edgy truck that raises eyebrows, fine. Maybe he's a great guy. Then again, maybe he's a fucking kidnapper/trafficker, I don't know.

I read this book a while back titled "The Gift of Fear: Survival Signals The Protect Us From Violence" by Gavin de Becker. He's supposedly an expert on the protection of public figures and has worked as a security adviser for three separate U.S. Presidents. He says that "Denial is a save now, pay later scheme." Thinking about that is what ultimately made me decide to call.

I don't know. Maybe it was nothing. But I don't feel like that often, and I can usually feel what other people are feeling. If I'm wrong, I maybe have just inconvenienced a perfectly innocent person for a few minutes. And maybe I waited too long to act on my hunch and I just let a serial killer get away. I don't know. Hopefully I did the right thing, and didn't wait too long. If it ever happens again, I don't think I'll hesitate so much.

Nothing can stop what is coming

WWG1WGA

Habakkuk chapter 1 and 2 talks of the Babylonians (who I consider the Satanists/Moloch worshippers/"Khazarian fake Jews" that others have referred to on the board).

Check this out:

Habakkuk 1: 5-11; 2

Look at the nations and watch—and be utterly amazed. For I am going to do something in your days that you would not believe, even if you were told. I am raising up the Babylonians, that ruthless and impetuous people, who sweep across the whole earth to seize dwellings not their own. They are a feared and dreaded people; they are a law to themselves and promote their own honor. Their horses are swifter than leopards, fiercer than wolves at dusk.Their cavalry gallops headlong; their horsemen come from afar. They fly like an eagle swooping to devour; they all come intent on violence. Their hordes advance like a desert wind and gather prisoners like sand. They mock kings and scoff at rulers. They laugh at all fortified cities; by building earthen ramps they capture them. Then they sweep past like the wind and go on—guilty people, whose own strength is their god....See, the enemy is puffed up; his desires are not upright—but the righteous person will live by his faithfulness—indeed, WINE BETRAYS HIM; HE IS ARROGANT, AND NEVER AT REST. Because he is as greedy as the grave and like death is never satisfied, he gathers to himself all the nations and takes captive all the peoples. Will not all of them taunt him with ridicule and scorn?"

How has Project Veritas gotten so many helpful and critical and shocking confessions from all these powerful men in media, government, lobbies, etc.?

By getting them drunk and sticking a pretty girl with a hidden camera in front of them.

As I read these chapters I literally stood up and yelled "Holy shit, it's Project Veritas!"

Psalms 57:6

"They spread a net for my feet—I was bowed down in distress. They dug a pit in my path—but they have fallen into it themselves."

Remember, good news is nice, but bad news is great news that we don't understand yet.

The Babylonian Cabal has fallen into quicksand. Nothing can stop what is coming for them. Nothing can stop them from drowning. Every move they make only hastens their demise. Let them squirm. Let them fight. As we walk through this valley of the shadow of death we should fear no evil. For the Trump has sounded. Those who have ears to hear have heard it.

This is why we can enjoy the show, and why we should.

Because we know how it ends.

Recently I saw someone post a video of a girl, an avowed astrologist, making an incredible point about waking people up to the truth. A certain poster replied smugly "I stopped watching at 'evolutionary astrology.'"

My. God.

Friends, be better than this. Some of you get so hung up on not listening to any source you don't trust that you miss SO much.

"Alex Jones is a Mossad agent, I don't trust anything he says."

Alex Jones may work for the enemy. He may be a Mossad agent trying to discredit real shit by screaming and yelling with a fat cherry red face and looking like a nutcase but how many of us first heard many of the things we now know are true from Alex Jones?

He may not be the ideal spokesman for our movement but talk about a boomerang effect if in fact that was the cabal's goal in placing him out there?

As an example, I just saw "Vengeance" by BJ Novak.

I don't know Novak's intentions. I don't know his allegiances. But as a Q researcher (and make no mistake, we are not "Q followers" or even "Q supporters" we are "Q researchers." Whether Q is a person, a group of people, a Quantum AI, God, some combination, or something else entirely, the FUNCTION of the Q posts is to act as A RESEARCH PROMPT to encourage CRITICAL THOUGHT to inspire THE GREAT AWAKENING. Only by the masses embracing critical thinking will the Great Awakening occur, if you ask me)...anyway, as a Q researcher, "Vengeance" really stood out to me for a number of reasons. I don't want to get sidetracked into what all of those reasons are but just know that I encourage you to watch it and put your Q goggles on when you do. I think you'll be blown away.

Anyway, slight spoiler for that movie here. One thing that becomes clear in the film is that Ashton Kutcher's character represents the Devil. But when we first meet him, he gives this incredibly beautiful speech that literally any Christian would appreciate about how the universe began with a sound (he says "Whether it was God saying 'Let there be light' or an infinite particle exploding in the 'Big Bang', everyone agrees the universe began with a sound.").

They give you every reason to like this guy (aside from his black cowboy hat--hint, hint), and the way he speaks about good Christian folk in the heartland makes you want to trust him. But ultimately his goal is to bewitch. Ultimately his doctrine is Nihilism. But before he gets there he says a lot of really beautiful, helpful, and true things.

I was watching this movie when this idea dawned on me. So often on this board people are yapping about whether we can trust Alex Jones, or Jack Posobiec, or Joe Rogan, or Ron DeSantis....holy shit it's exhausting.

Guys, we can't trust any of them to always tell the truth. And we won't know which side everyone is really on until this is over, if ever.

But we also shouldn't immediately stop listening to them when they're wrong assuming they're part of the cabal and just shut off our ears and brains.

Like the Alex Jones example, even if they are part of the cabal, it doesn't mean they can't be useful to us.

"They dug a pit in my path— but they have fallen into it themselves." -Psalms 57:6

We can't even trust Q to always tell the truth. Not after that "disinformation is necessary" comment. Apparently, Q lies too. And that's a good thing. Because if Q never told anything but the truth, we wouldn't have to learn to think critically. And that's what Q is trying to get us to do.

Stop looking for a prophet to make things easy for you. Q is not our prophet. He's helping you discover the Prophet within you though. Our prophet should be the Holy Spirit of Discernment. We should question everything we hear from everyone all the time. We should always be open to the possibility that our initial assumptions are wrong, about everyone and everything.

That's critical thinking. Q always says "Expand your thinking" I believe this is what that means.

If you're getting truth from the Devil himself it's still the truth. His intentions might be bad and you need to discern his intentions and separate the truth from the error but yes, even the Devil can teach you truth, if you're not too scared to listen, and you run everything he says through your inner Prophet, the Holy Spirit of Discernment.

When Christ left his Apostles, this was what he said they would need to learn to rely on. We should learn to do the same.

So again, don't throw the baby out with the bathwater. Shoot the messenger if you must, but don't discount the message because of him.

I can't say enough about this movie. It was my second favorite movie over the past couple of years after "Top Gun: Maverick."

Oddly enough it was for the exact opposite reason I loved "Maverick." While Maverick had ZERO woke bullshit in it, "Vengeance" opens the movie with it. And the tension between Right and Left, between Conservative and Liberal, between city folk and rural America is literally the center focus of the movie.

You WILL be annoyed for the first little while. You WILL say "Why did u/tobeselfevident think we would like this? Look how we're being portrayed."

But wait. Give it time. Give the movie a chance. You will not only be surprised, but if you really watch and really listen (I recommend watching with the subtitles on, by the way, because even the music and who sings it and the lyrics that are being used is critical to truly seeing and appreciating it for what it is), I think you'll be moved.

Honestly I feel like this should be THE movie of the Great Awakening.

Has anyone else seen it yet? I don't want to spoil it but if anyone wants to talk about it one on one who has seen it, whether you liked the movie or not, I would love to talk about it. I've dissected movies here before but they were movies that had been out for a long time so I didn't mind spoiling it but this one is so new I don't want to do that so please, I'm dying to talk to people about this one so feel free to DM me if you want to talk about it.

But yeah. Please, if you haven't seen it, and you didn't want to because of obvious reasons, I'm telling you, you're missing out.

Credit to u/rooftoptendie for this beautiful post that got me thinking. https://greatawakening.win/p/15JAvEcv7H/the-main-reason-why-your-normie-/c/

And to u/Oskar64 for posting this video: https://mobile.twitter.com/UltraLandlord/status/1562104516153147392?ref_src=twsrc%5Etfw%7Ctwcamp%5Etweetembed%7Ctwterm%5E1562104516153147392%7Ctwgr%5E11d15fd032e503e0989b89fee1b1dd1b2164d51e%7Ctwcon%5Es1_&ref_url=https%3A%2F%2Fgreatawakening.win%2Fp%2F15JTb4yrBs%2Fwhy-it-is-hard-to-wake-up-friend%2Fc%2F

Here were my thoughts that I just posted to instagram. For context, I was raised Mormon, but left Mormonism about 12 years ago. Most of my friends and followers are Ex-Mormon too. Many are Trump supporters, but many have gone to the dark side politically. This was mostly directed to the latter group.

So I'm not into astrology myself but this really applies to all kinds of things and she really hits the nail on the head here. I'm often amazed at how many people leave the Mormon Church only to find themselves almost instantly ardent Democrats/Liberals and vehemently anti-Christianity/anti-Jesus (that's not unique to Ex-Mormons--it's the same for Evangelical Christians from what I've seen, but I was Mormon so it's the bulk of my experience).

At first I thought it was a "throwing the baby out with the bathwater" kind of thing--their Mormon or Christian parents are usually conservative politically and when they leave their religions (usually because they find it hypocritical and ultimately harmful in many ways) they feel the urge to reject everything even remotely related to it. They see the "shadows on the wall" for what they really are in one of "Plato's caves" and they run screaming in the other direction the moment they step outside.

But I've just now realized there's actually something else at play here, and she touches on it beautifully in that video. Arguably the most painful part of the waking up process for religious "apostates" (such as myself) is the horrible feeling of rejection from the only tribe they ever knew once they started to question things.

This is exceptionally lonely and painful. They know they're not crazy and they yearn for someone to acknowledge that. They need to feel safe and normal again. They need a new tribe.

Well it just so happens that Leftist popular culture offers them this. All they have to do to find a new sense of belonging is turn on the TV. There they'll hear every criticism of their former religion they could ever ask for from nearly every actor, talking head, and Democrat politician they come across. They quickly find there's a large, diverse, robust community of people who feel like rejects too, with rich, beautiful and powerful people telling them they're not alone...and they take the bait hook, line, and sinker.

They don't realize it but they miss not having to think for themselves. They miss their Bishops and their Pastors and their Priests and Prophets being the experts on life and spoon feeding them their opinions and talking points.

They want to feel at ease again after their ordeal and leftist pop culture provides them that in spades.

Like Neo in "The Matrix" they took a red pill. There's no going back from that. What's seen can't be unseen. What's known can't be unknown. And what they just went through was traumatic and exhausting and they just want to rest.

They're in a new world now, like Neo was. Sure, it's literally a cave but everyone is being so nice to them. Except, of course, those stupid Christians and Republicans who they choose to do battle with constantly.

Why should they question their reality now? Why would they want to? Look how nice and pretty and cultured their new Priests are!

But watch them closely. Have they truly entered a higher state of consciousness? Sure, the world they came from was stifling and judgmental and full of hypocrites, and they could never go back even if they wanted to because they know too much to now, but how are they doing now?

Are they really happier? They can finally do everything they always wanted to without the usual social shame and guilt and yet...when they open their mouths...do they sound like they've found inner peace? Have they found the thing they thought was missing in their church? They have a new tribe now, so why the anger? Why the vitriol? Why have their lives fallen apart?

Could it be that there's something in their souls that tells them this was not the destination? Could this really just be another cave? Do they even want to know?

What if these "apostates" weren't wrong...but they weren't right either? What if there really was something to that whole Christianity thing but it had become polluted somehow, and it was that pollution that they were really running from?

What if, in this way, Liberalism is nothing but a trap for exhausted freethinkers?

Remember, Odysseus thought he'd found happiness in the arms of the Sirens. They offered him comfort and ease and pleasure unspeakable, and being weary from his travels, Odysseus welcomed it.

But they were a trap. The longer he stayed, the weaker he became. In the throes of those beautiful Sirens he started to forget what he was truly seeking. What really made him happy: the love of his wife and the sound of his baby boy.

This was a delicious cave indeed, but it was a lie. A mirage. A spiders web, and if he stayed there, it would ultimately destroy his happiness, ruin his dreams, and leave nothing but an empty husk.

Keep climbing, friends.

Election Fraud Denialism

An excerpt from "How the Grinch Stole Trumpmas" by Dr. Fauci

"'For 3 long years I've put up with it now.

I must stop this Trumpmas from coming, but how?'

Then he got an idea. A wonderful, awful idea.

What a great Grinchy trick! 'I'll have the Fake News say everyone's sick.

I'll have them wear masks, and stay in their homes

And then vote by mail, they won't even know

Just how many ballots we'll print just before

And plan to inject the next morning at 4

While everyone's sleeping they'll think Trump has won

But when the sun rises then we'll have our fun

And all the Whos down in Whoville will cry 'Trump lost to WHO??"

But we've got a plan to deal with them too.

We'll call them all crazy, we'll call them all sore

We'll cry 'Insurrection!" if they say anymore.

We'll keep the ruse going, we'll stick to the plan

We'll launder our money through Ukraine while we can.

There's no way they'll catch us, there's no way they'll know.

No justice will touch us, let's give it a go!"

*edit - The most important part of the post guys is the label: "election fraud denialism." We're hearing the term "election denialism" from the left. We need to co-opt that and say "yes, election fraud denialism really is a serious problem" and flip the label on its head. Beat them at their own label game.

Fetal Personhood Denialism

An excerpt from "Horton Hears a Whore" by Dr. Sploosh

"From the window to the wall.

A person's a person unless they're that small.

Cause if they still need me, and cannot yet crawl,

cannot yet speak, and cannot yet bawl,

I'll go on pretending they're not there at all.

For nothing is human that isn't that tall."

*edit - More labels for abortionists:

"fetal personhood denial syndrome"

"born supremacy"

"fetal homicide"

"prenatal filicide"

"prenatal maternal psychopathy"

"fetalphobia"

"anti-fetalism"

"fetus hate"

"pre-birth dehumanizing"

"anti-fetal bigotry"

"responsibility allergic"

"obligation-phobic"

"sympathetic selectivity"

"fetal genocidalism"

"abortion culture"

"birth snuffing"

See comments made by u/TRYNEIN in the thread below. If he's right (and it appears he may be), we can stop with all the "16th Amendment wasn't ratified properly" stuff and hoping Washington will willingly turn off their own cash cow, and just quietly go back and mark "exempt" on our W4's and stick it to Washington on our own.

If he's wrong, or he's missed something, someone feel free to explain why here and we can talk about it. But I thought his comments merited its own thread.

https://greatawakening.win/p/15IXpPHU7d/supreme-court--last-day-of-opini/c/

I gotta say, this is more what I had in mind when Q said things had to get worse before they could get better. I'm actually happy about gas and food prices. It's poor people who typically vote democrat and this is hitting them the hardest right now. They've got to be sitting around going "Wait, we HAVE our own oil, why doesn't Biden let us drill?" or they'll be asking that soon. Their excuses are going to stop mattering when it really affects THEM personally. There needs to be a stark contrast between what their quality of life was when Trump was President vs. now. Gas and food and rent--that's what poor Dems care about. And Biden and the Dems are in power and have nobody else to blame but themselves. Even the poor and stupid people are starting to figure it out. It sucks to see people suffer but as long as they don't suffer too much I say this will all have been for the better. As long as things remained relatively the same, or changed slowly over time, they could have explained it away. Not now. Going to be an interesting few months leading up to the midterms.

Remember guys, we're watching a movie. We know how the movie ends. We just don't know how long it is. Every loss will make the win that much sweeter. Every pit they dig they will fall into. In all good movies it's always darkest before the dawn. Only at the precipice...

I presume some of you have seen it. It's an excellent movie in my opinion. I think it holds some insight into how to understand Q's posts, the concept of future proves past is huge, the language is shaped like clocks and/or Q's. It involves non-linear thought. I'm too tired right now to break it down too much but maybe some others who have seen it want to chime in cause it definitely feels like there's something there.

If you are a Patriot, what exactly do you have against Q researchers/followers/supporters?

You think we've been duped--that Q is just a CIA psyop designed to pacify us and keep us from doing what we need to do to take our country back.

Ok, so what exactly are we NOT doing that you ARE?

Because to me, from your tone and your intensity and your rhetoric it feels an awful lot like what you're saying is that what we SHOULD be doing is grabbing our guns and storming D.C. and all our state capitols and hanging the traitors by the neck and reinstalling Trump as President.

Is that not what you're saying? If not, what ARE you saying? What makes you, as a fellow freedom loving patriot, better than us? You apparently haven't been duped. So where's your army? Why haven't you stormed the castle gates yet?

Are you suggesting that the only reason YOU haven't stormed the castle gates already is because you haven't convinced US to yet? Because from the looks of it based on the numbers on PDW vs GAW, we're definitely in the minority. If that's what you think needs to be done, what's stopping you?

Could it be because you're full of shit? You may not realize it but like half the shit you guys say over on PDW implies that you buy Q's view of the world anyway. Seems to me you're just too chicken shit to really look into Q and/or too chicken shit to align with it because you don't want to look like an idiot to your liberal masters, or you're just scared of being hurt again like we all were when the election didn't go as we hoped.

So tell me, seriously, if I'm the delusional one, what is my delusion thwarting? How is my delusion holding YOU back from doing what you so clearly want to do? What are you doing today that you think we Q followers aren't already doing? Why come here and try to get the rest of us to be as upset and panicked and miserable as you are--what's the goal exactly?

It's weird. I'm setting up recurring purchases in my SoFi account to buy GME, BTC, and DWAC (also setting aside $250/month for silver--I'm bracing for hyperinflation) and it's letting me set up recurring purchases for GME and BTC on the 2nd and the 16th but it's only giving me the option to buy DWAC manually. No automation offered there. Wonder why that is...