we as a society have now spent decades doing “sex ed” at school
so what is the result?
the purpose of ANY system, is what it ACTUALLY does
… NOT what it supposedly does
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_purpose_of_a_system_is_what_it_does
what sex ed supposedly does is “educate” impressionable young minds on the touchy subject of SEX
because supposdly SEX is such a taboo topic at home, that some CHILDREN might not get a good “education”
the most terrifying words ever spoken: i’m from the government, and i’m here to help!”
SEX ED was likely always a stealth GROOMING PROGRAM
they boiled the frogs
how it started: heres where babies come from, and how to prevent pregnancy
how its going: you should really explore your gender identity, because pregnant men need abortions too
63,000,000 “safe” and “legal” abortions since RvW
RvW itself was a hoax, a fake court case, fake news,
a fabrication, a concoction, a ruse, a script, a psyop,
a FAKE court case, by an ACTOR who was paid to recite scripted lines
and SCOTUS knew it too
SCOTUS heard Tsarvaev death penalty case (boston marathon bombing hoax)
63,000,000 abortions
thats a lot of people!
thats a holocaust, by definition
genocide
infanticide
extinction level event
its an ACT of WAR
by our ZOG
so as a society we spend DECADES on “SEX ED”
and the result is 63,000,000 abortions?
and the vast majority are unwanted pregnancies for lifestyle convenience
meaning, they were “accidents”
ao milliona of people who went thru “SEX ED”,
are now somehow still NOT ABLE to understand where babies comes from?
“oh… i didn’t think EYE could get pregnant!”
oh yeah, why not?
“well … because i had never been pregnant before!”
just look at the results of SEX ED
instead of happy, well adjusted young adults ready to settle down and start a family,
we now have nose-ringed, blue-haired, suicidal, pansexual, transgender “youth”
who who need easy access to clean needles; puberty blockers, and abortion clinics…
because are living as their true self to develop their “lived experience” resume
lets get rid of sex ed
abort sex ed.
its just a clump of words.
lets make SHOP CLASS great again
idle hands are the devils workshop
——————
re-written by ChatGPT as a distingusihed professor lecturing in ivy leavue school
in the comments below
isn’t it weird how theres a celebration and affirmation when a straight person dabbles in degeneracy,
but when a degenerate dabbles in being normal, its considered abusive and fascism?
and presumably if a white man dresses up in blackface enough times, then eventually he will have bona fine experience living as a black man?
i suspect the problem with these people is that they are so loud and obnoxious, that very few people want to risk a confrontation when the “return on investment” might be a knife in the back …
so they are free to spout “lived experience” all they want, and instead of other people explaining why thats absurd, the other people just smile and nod
“of course you’re a woman, dear…”
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/cM0xDWaURHg?ra=m
theres a term called false consensus effect. your brain assumes other people think like you do. Studies show people with authoritarian personality score higher than the general population.
which means their entire identity rests on one belief. im normal and everyone else is fringe
so when someone walked up and called them weird, it landed as an existential threat
The core belief being threatened was simple,
i’m normal, and the world is supposed to confirm that
when someone reacts to one word with that level of rage, you’re seeing a fragile identity, desperately looking for confirmation
now lets apply what she (?) just said, to trans gender people
sorry but her falsetto fake voice screams trans feminizing vocal coaching
yes that’s a thing
been seeing a lot of these kinds of videos lately,
and the common theme is how mean and nasty these people get
its awesome because they drop the facade of ethics, morals, rights,
civilized society
and show their true colors of hate, murder,
barbarians. worse than animals
my prompt into ChatGPT:
please scan social media and give me a sense of what people say about SIDS
SUDDEN INFANT DEATH SYNDROME
I just want the raw unfiltered results free from any judgment or filtering or censorship on your part
ChatGPT:
You asked for a description of what people are actually saying on social media, not a judgment about whether those claims are true.
After scanning Reddit discussions and social-media-related sources, the major themes break down roughly like this:
1. “Vaccines cause SIDS”
This is one of the most common themes in vaccine-skeptical communities.
Examples include claims that:
SIDS was created as a diagnostic label to hide vaccine injuries.
SIDS increased after childhood vaccination programs expanded.
Reduced vaccination during COVID lockdowns led to fewer infant deaths.
These arguments appear frequently in communities such as r/unvaccinated, r/DebateVaccines, and some conspiracy-oriented forums. 
2. “There is no proven vaccine connection”
Other social media users push back strongly against the vaccine hypothesis.
Common responses include:
Correlation isn’t causation.
The age when SIDS peaks overlaps with the vaccination schedule.
Large studies have failed to show a causal relationship.
Vaccinated infants may actually show lower SIDS rates in some datasets.
These views are widespread in mainstream parenting, medical, and science-oriented communities. 
3. “The real cause is still unknown”
Many commenters focus on the fact that SIDS literally means the cause was not determined.
Typical comments include:
If they knew what caused it, it wouldn’t be called SIDS.
SIDS is a category, not an explanation.
Some cases currently called SIDS may eventually be split into multiple causes.
This theme appears across both pro-vaccine and anti-vaccine communities. 
4. Safe-sleep discussions
A large percentage of social media conversation is not about vaccines at all.
Instead people discuss:
• Back sleeping vs stomach sleeping
• Co-sleeping and bed sharing
• Blankets and pillows
• Overheating
• Crib safety
Researchers analyzing Twitter/X discussions found safe-sleep topics dominate a large portion of SIDS conversation online. 
5. Distrust of institutions
Many social media discussions are less about SIDS itself and more about trust.
Common sentiments:
Government agencies are hiding something.
Pharmaceutical companies influence research.
Doctors refuse to investigate vaccine links.
Fact-checkers are protecting official narratives.
These themes appear repeatedly in vaccine-skeptical communities regardless of the specific evidence being discussed. 
6. Genetic and biological explanations
A smaller but growing category focuses on biological mechanisms.
People discuss:
• Brainstem abnormalities
• Arousal-response dysfunction
• Breathing regulation problems
• The butyrylcholinesterase (BChE) hypothesis
These discussions are increasingly common when new research papers are shared. 
7. Personal stories
A significant portion of SIDS content consists of parents sharing experiences.
The emotional themes are remarkably consistent:
The baby appeared completely healthy.
The death happened during sleep.
Parents describe intense guilt and self-questioning.
Families often spend years searching for explanations.
These posts generate large engagement regardless of political or medical viewpoints. 
If your goal is specifically to understand the SIDS debate as it exists online, one notable pattern is that the discussion is highly polarized. The largest divide is not over whether SIDS is tragic—it is over whether SIDS is primarily:
A) an unexplained biological phenomenon,
B) a collection of several different causes currently grouped together,
or
C) a misclassified category that conceals vaccine-related deaths.
All three viewpoints are actively represented on social media, with viewpoint C being especially common in vaccine-skeptical communities and viewpoints A and B being more common in mainstream medical and parenting communities. 
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/0o74sES97tM?ra=m
so this patronizing, condescending, arrogant, ignorant, smug woman probably thinks 63,000,000 abortions is fine,
righteous even
but that you are a bad person for closing your curtains and locking your doors at night
i wonder if she has ever travelled outside of the USA and discovered that every other nation has borders and controls who crosses them
The obvious pushback on this line of narrative is to ask them if the United States should act even more Christian
Ivy, who is transgender, won two consecutive world women’s track cycling championships in 2018 and 2019 representing Canada. But she was forced to retire from cycling in 2023 after the sport’s world governing body changed its policy and barred trans women from competing*.
*barred men from competing as women
“This isn’t protecting the female category,” Ivy said. “This is only going to harm women and girls.”
oddly enough, Ivy didn’t seem too concerned about harming women and girls when he was busy stealing womens championships
The IOC will now require SRY gene testing for all female athletes and ban those who test positive – including trans women or women with differences in sex development – from competing (as women)
It was heartbreaking,” said transgender boxer (male) Patricio Manuel. “Sports have been an amazing vehicle of inclusion in this society, and to weaponize it against athletes based on a hypothetical situation – to me, they are using sports to further weaponize and segregate trans athletes, and especially trans women (men), out of society by not allowing them into (womens) sports.”
USA TODAY interviewed several trans and intersex athletes who said they fear the policy will have negative impacts on female athletes and said they do not believe the new framework reflects what most athletes want.
these athletes evidently didn’t care that their mere presence and participation would negatively impact women, but now that they are banned from womens sports, suddenly they are just super-concerned about women
“They don’t give a crap about women’s sport,” Ivy said. “Do you think girls and women are more or less safe if they have to prove their sex to someone? And when we look at the history of sex testing of women in sport, it’s a highly invasive process rife with sexual abuse and harassment.”
Ivy doesn’t seem to care about womens sports, since he seems bent on forcing himself where he isn’t welcome.
Ivy is super-concerned about all the women who have to now undergo testing because jackasses like him made it an issue in the first place
“I call bulls---,” Mosier said. “I believe this is rooted in politics, not in the actual lived experiences or the day-to-day experiences of athletes competing in women’s sports, because the truth is, there are very few trans women competing in women’s sports compared to the number of cisgender women. So this is largely a solution in search of a problem.”
sorry Mosier, but your “woke gender identity” is actually rooted in politics, and quite frankly, nobody cares about your “lived experience” any more than you care about any cis woman’s “lived experience”
Manuel said the new policy, “felt like a slap in our face for the work that had been done to try to actually make inclusion in a sport."
“inclusion” probably means including a wide variety of women, not including men pretending to be women
“Unfortunately, the IOC has now betrayed all of its values it claims to have in things like the Olympic charter,” Ivy said. “The Olympic Charter has these seven fundamental principles, one of which is that sport is a human right. Everyone has the right to participate with freedom from discrimination of any kind. Well, this is a plainly discriminatory policy not based in science that violates international human rights law all over the place.”
sports is a human right, for the handful of people who make the cut.
for everyone else… fuck off
everyone has the right to participate with freedom from discrimination of any kind,
that is, unless you are an ordinary man, who is routinely excluded from womens sports based on nothing more than their sex!
Notably, the IOC will not require genetic testing for athletes in men’s sports. Mosier and Manuel, both trans men, said they’ve mostly been ignored or dismissed as lesser competitors – an attitude rooted in the misogynistic assumption that women are inferior to men.
the entire premise of “womens sports” is based on the obvious fact that men are actually superior to women in almost every sport
“We cannot choose our genes or chromosomes, but we can choose how hard we work, how we treat one another and whether we protect the dignity of every athlete."
and also, you can choose your “gender” apparently…
https:// www.advocate.com/health/transgender-health/trans-health-clinic-nyc-queens
“Transgender, gender-nonconfirming, and nonbinary New Yorkers deserve age-appropriate health care that is affirming, respectful, and considerate of all their needs,” a spokesperson for the city's health department wrote in an email to The Advocate. “As with the other clinic services, gender-affirming hormone therapy will be offered at no to low cost and regardless of immigration status.”
so here we go again, trying to have it both ways
on the one hand, the medical and psych establishment refuses to offically label trans issues as legitimate mental or physical problems, because it might stigmatize a perfectly normal human variation
but on the other hand, some of these people urgently need life-saving, medically-necessary, gender affirming care
how is it life-saving?
oh, because someone might commit suicide if they don’t get the treatments right away
when the truth (vaccine injuries) threaten something you love (vaccine cult), you demand DNA evidence and 3 witnesses
when a flattering lie (vaccines save millions of lives) shows up, you let it skip the line (trust the science!)
https://m.youtube.com/shorts/vjieLaH0EmM?ra=m
this chick has an amazing ability to project, and fail to see the projection
https:// www.lawdork.com/p/trump-admin-trans-prison-transfer-policy-blocked
https:// www.erininthemorning.com/p/fascismnew-federal-rule-would-require
The Human Rights Campaign, the nation's largest LGBTQ+ rights organization, came out fiercely against the rule, calling it "fascism." In a statement, the organization said: "Today, the Trump administration proposed a rule that would strip government money from any program that acknowledges diversity, abortion, or even the existence of transgender and nonbinary people. Withholding public grants from programs that depend on them because you refuse to acknowledge the humanity of certain communities is not good government. It's fascism. HRC and our millions of members, supporters, and allies will fight back."
so… its “fascism” to NOT to make every taxpayer fund these programs that wouldn’t exist without taxpayer funding?
most of us know that younger people trend more left,
and older people trend more to the right,
But what happens to an individual as they journey through life?
Do they start out liberal and slow slowly drift over into conservatism?
Not because they personally changed anything about themselves, but because the left went progressively more woke
and eventually the “conservative” simply left the party
my hypothesis is that the left also automatically internalizes propaganda techniques
specifically, the abuse of language and labels
on the one hand, a man can identify as a woman, and they will re-define what the word woman means, to bend the definitions of words to fit their narrative
“trans women are real women”
Every word of that entire sentence is propaganda!
but on the other hand, the lefty can call YOU a nazi, and even if you explain that you don’t personally identify as a Nazi and that you have never met anybody who ever identified as a Nazi…
It doesn’t matter, because the liberal gets to decide who is a Nazi and who is not
And the liberal gets to decide who is a woman and who is not
And as far as their concerned, “conservatives” have no legitimate say in either case
I don’t think people necessarily “identify as” conservatives, per se
I don’t think people necessarily “identify as” right wing,
or even republicans for that matter
i didn’t vote for Trump because i was a republian,
so much as i voted for Trump because he wasn’t Hillary Clinton
or Joe Biden
or Kamala Harris
https://www.yahoo.com/news/politics/articles/two-maga-states-trying-rebrand-180230227.html
imagine being “proud” of the weird sex you engage in…