To be truly convincing, we'd need another with all the Q predictions that did not come true, lest we be guilty of confirmation bias/sharp shooter's fallacy, etc. If one wants to be convincing, you need to account for all the data, not just the data that supports what we want or hope to be true.
That's really hard to do because some things posted by Q were done so as disinformation. Other things have not happened yet; they're still in the future. Many other things have double meanings. What hasn't come true with one meaning, may have happened if viewed from another meaning. And things are fluid. If some things haven't happened exactly as stated, things changed on the ground and another plan adopted. It doesn't disprove Q and the information presented in the drops.
To be truly convincing, we'd need another with all the Q predictions that did not come true, lest we be guilty of confirmation bias/sharp shooter's fallacy, etc. If one wants to be convincing, you need to account for all the data, not just the data that supports what we want or hope to be true.
That's really hard to do because some things posted by Q were done so as disinformation. Other things have not happened yet; they're still in the future. Many other things have double meanings. What hasn't come true with one meaning, may have happened if viewed from another meaning. And things are fluid. If some things haven't happened exactly as stated, things changed on the ground and another plan adopted. It doesn't disprove Q and the information presented in the drops.