First I'll address his claim of source: fire will show on cameras, blast will not always show. This was a big explosion (my guess is some type of fuel based bomb). You will see blast damage at the source (eg no fire), incidiary (fire) further from source, and frag further from that. He's trying to talk about shit he doesn't understand. If all you watch is movies and think an explosion equals fire this makes sense. If you've done anything with bombs and missiles you can tell this dude knows all of jack and shit.
As for the "missile theory"
That angle would be all wrong for a missile, the smoke also burns out too fast on a missile.
To have a missile hit in between buildings youd need a LOAL-H (high impact angle) otherwise it wouldn't make it into the target area and you risk the podium effect if lazer guided or loss of link if guided by GPS.
If there was ignition of a missile you'd see it in the video, you can see them on an overcast day from very high up with the naked eye.
The most common motor for missiles the the M120, the actual burn time of those is seconds, typical times of flight for a missile at altitude is tens of seconds. So for the smoke to appear yiud have ignition where that smoke comes off, think mini explosion in the sky, you can see these from miles away with the naked eye.
missiles move beyond supersonic, eg- really fucking fast. Did that smoke appear to move at over 761 MPH? Do you hear a sonic boom of the "missile" 2-4 seconds before the explosion? Let's say its a subsonic missile, could be, but they still move 600mph + did thay smoke move that fast? Also youd still see a flash from rocket motor ignition.
This video shows something but its not a missile. Also not a DEW, most DEW are RF-microwave spectrums. You can't see either.
My opinion, this dude and others are unknowledgable and speculating on things they don't understand
A missile would have shown up on airport radar as an artifact, but would have been visible at or near the time of the detonation. This artifact would quickly have been shown to be the incoming missile in the post-mortem. I am surprised nobody has thought of checking with the FAA.
I don't think we can rule out all DEW's at this point. That would not show up on radar, and could cause explosions of gas tanks, propane tanks, etc.
So in other words we should just trust the experts. Like Covid-19, just trust the experts. Experts say we should all stay in. Experts say just because a fireball appeared 100 feet away from the RV it doesn't mean the RV wasn't the source, etc. Don't use our own common sense, trust the experts.
Are you fucking retarded? Did I ever give you 1 piece of advice on what to do with your life, how to think, or act? I gave solid analysis based on years of experiance. Can I be wrong, of course. But its 1000 times more plausible than your dumb ass rant about covid and other bullshit.
I said, and I quote "this dude and others are unknowledgable and speculating on things they don't understand".
Want to understand? Do actual fucking research, not a couple of YouTube videos which feeds into confirmation bias.
You aren't using common sense, you're being a whiny cunt because I said something you don't like.
Wow, angry! Actually I've spent the last 10 years of my life hearing about how "uneducated people need to just listen to the experts!" on a variety of topics. Global warming, covid, 9/11, vaccines, etc etc down the list. Common sense tells me that the initial blast occurred quite a distance away from the RV. It appeared to be something that came from the sky. That is what is readily apparent that my eyes are telling me. Here you are telling me not to trust my eyes, but I need to trust experts who have more experience. Is that not exactly the gist of what you just said? Where do you think the blast came from?
No, im explaining what you're seeing and providing actual facts based on my years of experience and probably hundreds of missile strikes, 12 years of actual combat operations (not time in service actual combat), dealing with IED's, artillery, bombs etc.
Then you legit bring some covid BS into it like im out here trying to get one over on anyone. You're attacking my character because you see what you want and dismissed anything I stated without fact, thought, or even consideration because it doesn't fit what you want it to. Good day to you, Im not arguing this.
Whatever happened it certainly doesn't look as the source of the explosion was from the Camper that I assume was on the left hand side of the road in this picture.
Not conclusive just speculation and an implausible theory.
Is it possible that a plume of smoke blocks fireball along right hand side of street where RV is parked. Video clip too short. Just saying. A current image from the same viewpoint can easily be obtained and any blast pattern can support or disprove this theory. At the very least this theory should site the specific location of the camera. Street number, cross street etc to build this case.
Thanks everyone that has commented so far. Seems to be plenty of good rationale on debunking these claims. I was also questioning his "across the street" explosion as I could clearly see blast-smoke occlusion in the footage he was using
Possibility ( however remote) of being a "Rod From God" tungsten weapon? The big ones are about the size of a telephone pole, have no actual explosives in them, just kinetic energy traveling at very high speed, and the impact causes an explosion upon hitting the target. Massive energy release as a function of mass X velocity. Further thought, I'm sure these can be scaled down by delivering a smaller mass Rod, so as to carry out a surgical strike on a block or one building. The velocity of a RFG would be quite high, and maybe captured on two or three frames of video at most.
No, just no. There would be massive sonic booms heard for miles. There was a metioriod shower with smaller than a telephone poll sized debris in Southern Canada about 2 weeks ago. It was heard in Pennsylvania.
How about a propane bomb? The trail of upwards smoke could be one cannister that shot up the instant of the explosion followed by a billow of smoke. Idk, just throwing it out there. That would explain no crater as well.
First I'll address his claim of source: fire will show on cameras, blast will not always show. This was a big explosion (my guess is some type of fuel based bomb). You will see blast damage at the source (eg no fire), incidiary (fire) further from source, and frag further from that. He's trying to talk about shit he doesn't understand. If all you watch is movies and think an explosion equals fire this makes sense. If you've done anything with bombs and missiles you can tell this dude knows all of jack and shit.
As for the "missile theory" That angle would be all wrong for a missile, the smoke also burns out too fast on a missile.
To have a missile hit in between buildings youd need a LOAL-H (high impact angle) otherwise it wouldn't make it into the target area and you risk the podium effect if lazer guided or loss of link if guided by GPS.
If there was ignition of a missile you'd see it in the video, you can see them on an overcast day from very high up with the naked eye.
The most common motor for missiles the the M120, the actual burn time of those is seconds, typical times of flight for a missile at altitude is tens of seconds. So for the smoke to appear yiud have ignition where that smoke comes off, think mini explosion in the sky, you can see these from miles away with the naked eye.
missiles move beyond supersonic, eg- really fucking fast. Did that smoke appear to move at over 761 MPH? Do you hear a sonic boom of the "missile" 2-4 seconds before the explosion? Let's say its a subsonic missile, could be, but they still move 600mph + did thay smoke move that fast? Also youd still see a flash from rocket motor ignition.
This video shows something but its not a missile. Also not a DEW, most DEW are RF-microwave spectrums. You can't see either.
My opinion, this dude and others are unknowledgable and speculating on things they don't understand
A missile would have shown up on airport radar as an artifact, but would have been visible at or near the time of the detonation. This artifact would quickly have been shown to be the incoming missile in the post-mortem. I am surprised nobody has thought of checking with the FAA.
I don't think we can rule out all DEW's at this point. That would not show up on radar, and could cause explosions of gas tanks, propane tanks, etc.
So in other words we should just trust the experts. Like Covid-19, just trust the experts. Experts say we should all stay in. Experts say just because a fireball appeared 100 feet away from the RV it doesn't mean the RV wasn't the source, etc. Don't use our own common sense, trust the experts.
Are you fucking retarded? Did I ever give you 1 piece of advice on what to do with your life, how to think, or act? I gave solid analysis based on years of experiance. Can I be wrong, of course. But its 1000 times more plausible than your dumb ass rant about covid and other bullshit.
I said, and I quote "this dude and others are unknowledgable and speculating on things they don't understand".
Want to understand? Do actual fucking research, not a couple of YouTube videos which feeds into confirmation bias.
You aren't using common sense, you're being a whiny cunt because I said something you don't like.
Wow, angry! Actually I've spent the last 10 years of my life hearing about how "uneducated people need to just listen to the experts!" on a variety of topics. Global warming, covid, 9/11, vaccines, etc etc down the list. Common sense tells me that the initial blast occurred quite a distance away from the RV. It appeared to be something that came from the sky. That is what is readily apparent that my eyes are telling me. Here you are telling me not to trust my eyes, but I need to trust experts who have more experience. Is that not exactly the gist of what you just said? Where do you think the blast came from?
No, im explaining what you're seeing and providing actual facts based on my years of experience and probably hundreds of missile strikes, 12 years of actual combat operations (not time in service actual combat), dealing with IED's, artillery, bombs etc.
Then you legit bring some covid BS into it like im out here trying to get one over on anyone. You're attacking my character because you see what you want and dismissed anything I stated without fact, thought, or even consideration because it doesn't fit what you want it to. Good day to you, Im not arguing this.
Whatever happened it certainly doesn't look as the source of the explosion was from the Camper that I assume was on the left hand side of the road in this picture.
This may be out there on other posts, but I found this article very helpful and explains a lot of what you stated in the first paragraph. https://www.libertariannews.org/2020/12/26/the-nashville-bombing-didnt-come-from-an-rv/
Seems, at face value, highly supportive of missile theory.
Look up direct energy weapon (DEW)
Not conclusive just speculation and an implausible theory.
Is it possible that a plume of smoke blocks fireball along right hand side of street where RV is parked. Video clip too short. Just saying. A current image from the same viewpoint can easily be obtained and any blast pattern can support or disprove this theory. At the very least this theory should site the specific location of the camera. Street number, cross street etc to build this case.
If there was a missile it was launched from a drone, hence the limited smoke trail.
I'm thinking something along the lines of a drone mounted Hellfire missile and definitely not a large ordinance payload, supersonic bunker buster.
Mission goal could be distraction in nature, to remove evidence and change impending Q / Q+ narratives.
You have no clue what you're talking about.
Thanks everyone that has commented so far. Seems to be plenty of good rationale on debunking these claims. I was also questioning his "across the street" explosion as I could clearly see blast-smoke occlusion in the footage he was using
Possibility ( however remote) of being a "Rod From God" tungsten weapon? The big ones are about the size of a telephone pole, have no actual explosives in them, just kinetic energy traveling at very high speed, and the impact causes an explosion upon hitting the target. Massive energy release as a function of mass X velocity. Further thought, I'm sure these can be scaled down by delivering a smaller mass Rod, so as to carry out a surgical strike on a block or one building. The velocity of a RFG would be quite high, and maybe captured on two or three frames of video at most.
No, just no. There would be massive sonic booms heard for miles. There was a metioriod shower with smaller than a telephone poll sized debris in Southern Canada about 2 weeks ago. It was heard in Pennsylvania.
How about a propane bomb? The trail of upwards smoke could be one cannister that shot up the instant of the explosion followed by a billow of smoke. Idk, just throwing it out there. That would explain no crater as well.
The trail preceded the explosion in the video elsewhere.
That makes 1000% more sense than these other theories.