Why has it not been used as evidence in multiple hearings
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (13)
sorted by:
Because the MSM deboonked it. As far as I know they said "taken out of context". I watched it in full context and the only other alternative meaning is that he meant to say "Voter fraud prevention organisation". But thats complete rubbish, because if that were true, why are there no audits or anything else?