...an attorney could also be an anon.
She's a person...her job is to be a lawyer.
She could be an anon and also retweeted (not created) the meme.
✌?
www.stayhuman.me
Yeah, I mean, of course. Just saying, I don't think she made it, and I don't think Sidney is in the habit of making memes, but I could be wrong, of course.
She also demonstrated to us where "spelling matters" in her two court submissions about a month ago ("The Kraken").
The first page of both, including the title and several names, had typos.
I love that! She knows exactly how "spelling" is important in court, and also where the spelling is not important. She gave those of us with eyes to see, a lesson, embedded in The Kraken. And I only read the first few pages of each; I'm sure there was much more in there!
Replied to u/FractalizingIron about court "spelling" -- also, want to mention that the "typo" could be deliberate, aligning with the almost-in-tears speech that (Meadows, was it? It was recent) said during a speech, about thanking someone (VP Pence?) for the swift military action -- and the wording seemed to indicate that it had already occurred.
So, the stronghold may have already been demolished, at the time she posted.
God bless.
[Edit, I see others already said so earlier, below.]
[Edit2: is there a way to change the default sort order to "Old", so I read in chronological order? Thanks!]
Acting Sec. of Defense **Miller ** thanked Pence, for mentoring and leadership, steadfastness (not for 'swift military action')
'Power to demolished your stronghold' is not past tense, it's non-grammatical. So, sure, possibly it might be a cryptic clue, but a) why would you think so (apart from pure conjecture) and b) what would be the intent of a cryptic communication?
Case in point - Q uses cryptic communications, but for a specific purpose: disinfo; to drop clues to inspire digging, searching, investigation; obscuring information to only those who know the cypher, decode method, etc.
Personally, I think some folks just go too far in grasping for explanations or following their imagination, or guessing, etc. Q advises very strongly: clear thinking, logical thinking, due diligence, not following the emotional drives, etc.
So, if Powell's mis-spellings in the Kraken document were intentional, what was their purpose? What objective is she attempting to accomplish?
To me, it seems far, far more logical, reasonable, and likely that she found this meme, liked it, and sent it out, and that destroyed is simply a mistake of the creator. Fantasies might be comforting, but ultimately, discipline (mental, physical, emotional, etc) is key to victory in war.
Be well.
PS. you think YOU are verbose? Verbose is my middle name!
Haha! I was given this nickname but yeah, I align with it as well. :)
Thank you for the corrections!
The intent of cryptic communication is to whisper, effectively, unnoticed.
Purpose: I believe that the first page of each Kraken filing was riddled with typos, in order to show us exactly where "spelling" matters in court, and where it does not. These are high-level lessons, for "spell-casters" a term my wife does not like; I have a background in D&D and AD&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons) and although it's fictional role playing, there's a basis in history that we're not taught in schools, as well.
Read recently (here, I think!) that President Trump has been in construction (carpenter, kek!) all his life, working with attorneys on deals, and from his association with attorneys, has learned the importance of proper word placement. In other words, "spelling matters." Sidney is giving us a similar peek behind the curtain.
Liberals mocked her typos to no end. I see the end purpose of those typos. Well, at least one of them, and I'm concussed and don't always perceive the world correctly, anyway.
The intent of cryptic communication is to whisper, effectively, unnoticed.
Hmmm. Yes, but the purpose is not simply to whisper for whisperings sake, right? The purpose of communication is most normally to deliver a message; the question here is, what is the message, and why would it need to be delivered cryptically?
Purpose: I believe that the first page of each Kraken filing was riddled with typos, in order to show us exactly where "spelling" matters in court, and where it does not. These are high-level lessons, for "spell-casters" a term my wife does not like; I have a background in D&D and AD&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons) and although it's fictional role playing, there's a basis in history that we're not taught in schools, as well.
I haven't examined the Kraken papers. I heard that the plethora of mistakes ensured that the Media paid attention to them, instead of just burying them. Give them something to attack, criticize, mock, and wallah! attention!
I'd need more concrete examples of how the misspellings communicated a message e.g. what is important and what isn't in court filings - in order to entertain that theory.
But questions remain: WHY on earth would Powell think that such a lesson needed to be communicated secretly? In that method? I don't really sense the broader context that makes the cryptic work of Q sensible and intelligible, and reasonable.
Let me give an example in order to illustrate. Dan Scavino has been shooting out images and vids via his personal twitter account for some time recently. For example, the [punisher] mark on the air plane wing, the red line diner in conjunction with POTUS with finger on a 'red line' the flag, the dolphins where a jet ski appears exactly at 17 seconds in, Potus with fingers in an upside down Q using sign language, etc,
These certainly fit the bill of cryptic communications. Because anons now know the code, its intelligible. WHY choose this method? For me, the message I get is: It's OK people, we are on track. Q operation is on track. Have faith, we're still here. Etc.
Cryptic because it means nothing to the unknowing, but something to the knowing. Plausible deniability. Subtle.
So we have intent, purpose, message, need, etc. But I just don't see that (all of those) so far in the Powell Kraken misspellings example, nor in the misspelled 'destroyed' word in the aforementioned meme.
Replying to myself, in case others have similar question (I just got here from Voat a couple days ago): on Desktop: click the gear in the upper right, one menu item is "Settings" and it's in there. Dark mode as well.
So, the stronghold may have already been demolished, at the time she posted.
Like other issues in this timeline, I will believe it when I see it. Ellen Degenerate was supposedly under house arrest; now she's back on her TV show. Tom Hanks was supposedly captured and under arrest; now he's back to making movies and doing TV appearances. You can go on and on down the list. Schumer, Pelosi, etc etc etc.
sigh
Pretty sure Powell did NOT create this meme, but took it and posted it.
She's an attorney, not an anon.
I know who she is. My ::sigh:: was for the constant illiterate memes I see across the boards.
5:5
me too
...an attorney could also be an anon. She's a person...her job is to be a lawyer. She could be an anon and also retweeted (not created) the meme. ✌? www.stayhuman.me
Yeah, I mean, of course. Just saying, I don't think she made it, and I don't think Sidney is in the habit of making memes, but I could be wrong, of course.
Word.
She also demonstrated to us where "spelling matters" in her two court submissions about a month ago ("The Kraken").
The first page of both, including the title and several names, had typos.
I love that! She knows exactly how "spelling" is important in court, and also where the spelling is not important. She gave those of us with eyes to see, a lesson, embedded in The Kraken. And I only read the first few pages of each; I'm sure there was much more in there!
https://defendingtherepublic.org/#donate is her organization.
God bless.
What was the lesson you think she gave?
Hi, just replied to your other comment, with this answer, over here: https://greatawakening.win/p/11RO2hblqP/x/c/4DrwVfN6Q7s
Replied to u/FractalizingIron about court "spelling" -- also, want to mention that the "typo" could be deliberate, aligning with the almost-in-tears speech that (Meadows, was it? It was recent) said during a speech, about thanking someone (VP Pence?) for the swift military action -- and the wording seemed to indicate that it had already occurred.
So, the stronghold may have already been demolished, at the time she posted.
God bless.
[Edit, I see others already said so earlier, below.]
[Edit2: is there a way to change the default sort order to "Old", so I read in chronological order? Thanks!]
Thanks.
Acting Sec. of Defense **Miller ** thanked Pence, for mentoring and leadership, steadfastness (not for 'swift military action')
'Power to demolished your stronghold' is not past tense, it's non-grammatical. So, sure, possibly it might be a cryptic clue, but a) why would you think so (apart from pure conjecture) and b) what would be the intent of a cryptic communication?
Case in point - Q uses cryptic communications, but for a specific purpose: disinfo; to drop clues to inspire digging, searching, investigation; obscuring information to only those who know the cypher, decode method, etc.
Personally, I think some folks just go too far in grasping for explanations or following their imagination, or guessing, etc. Q advises very strongly: clear thinking, logical thinking, due diligence, not following the emotional drives, etc.
So, if Powell's mis-spellings in the Kraken document were intentional, what was their purpose? What objective is she attempting to accomplish?
To me, it seems far, far more logical, reasonable, and likely that she found this meme, liked it, and sent it out, and that destroyed is simply a mistake of the creator. Fantasies might be comforting, but ultimately, discipline (mental, physical, emotional, etc) is key to victory in war.
Be well.
PS. you think YOU are verbose? Verbose is my middle name!
Haha! I was given this nickname but yeah, I align with it as well. :)
Thank you for the corrections!
The intent of cryptic communication is to whisper, effectively, unnoticed.
Purpose: I believe that the first page of each Kraken filing was riddled with typos, in order to show us exactly where "spelling" matters in court, and where it does not. These are high-level lessons, for "spell-casters" a term my wife does not like; I have a background in D&D and AD&D (Advanced Dungeons and Dragons) and although it's fictional role playing, there's a basis in history that we're not taught in schools, as well.
Read recently (here, I think!) that President Trump has been in construction (carpenter, kek!) all his life, working with attorneys on deals, and from his association with attorneys, has learned the importance of proper word placement. In other words, "spelling matters." Sidney is giving us a similar peek behind the curtain.
Liberals mocked her typos to no end. I see the end purpose of those typos. Well, at least one of them, and I'm concussed and don't always perceive the world correctly, anyway.
Love you! God bless.
Hmmm. Yes, but the purpose is not simply to whisper for whisperings sake, right? The purpose of communication is most normally to deliver a message; the question here is, what is the message, and why would it need to be delivered cryptically?
I haven't examined the Kraken papers. I heard that the plethora of mistakes ensured that the Media paid attention to them, instead of just burying them. Give them something to attack, criticize, mock, and wallah! attention!
I'd need more concrete examples of how the misspellings communicated a message e.g. what is important and what isn't in court filings - in order to entertain that theory.
But questions remain: WHY on earth would Powell think that such a lesson needed to be communicated secretly? In that method? I don't really sense the broader context that makes the cryptic work of Q sensible and intelligible, and reasonable.
Let me give an example in order to illustrate. Dan Scavino has been shooting out images and vids via his personal twitter account for some time recently. For example, the [punisher] mark on the air plane wing, the red line diner in conjunction with POTUS with finger on a 'red line' the flag, the dolphins where a jet ski appears exactly at 17 seconds in, Potus with fingers in an upside down Q using sign language, etc,
These certainly fit the bill of cryptic communications. Because anons now know the code, its intelligible. WHY choose this method? For me, the message I get is: It's OK people, we are on track. Q operation is on track. Have faith, we're still here. Etc.
Cryptic because it means nothing to the unknowing, but something to the knowing. Plausible deniability. Subtle.
So we have intent, purpose, message, need, etc. But I just don't see that (all of those) so far in the Powell Kraken misspellings example, nor in the misspelled 'destroyed' word in the aforementioned meme.
Peace and blessings, V.
Signed, FI
Replying to myself, in case others have similar question (I just got here from Voat a couple days ago): on Desktop: click the gear in the upper right, one menu item is "Settings" and it's in there. Dark mode as well.
Like other issues in this timeline, I will believe it when I see it. Ellen Degenerate was supposedly under house arrest; now she's back on her TV show. Tom Hanks was supposedly captured and under arrest; now he's back to making movies and doing TV appearances. You can go on and on down the list. Schumer, Pelosi, etc etc etc.
If you can order a clone of your pet now, you gotta figure they've been cloning people for years.
https://eraoflight.com/2019/06/19/angela-merkel-trembling-glitch-in-the-old-matrix/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sFBDkuJ0BqI (mk ultra/cloning?)
https://truthscrambler.com/2018/06/20/celebrity-cloning-glitches-and-inconsistencies/