Ok talk to me like I'm stupid. This whole Lin Wood drama.

What reasonable evidence does anyone have that Wood is not another disinfo sideshow, who's leveraging the 'in the know' comms of Q and other anon movements?

I ask because he has begun to rack up a poor track record -- claims about watermarked ballots, that supposed server raid in Germany based on one single tweet in German, etc.

Thus far I see Wood and his kind and the election fraud claims to have been a big part of the basis for the courts to not even hear legitimate election irregularity and fraud cases. He now has a track record of hurting Trump team's chances of getting legal footing for the election fraud/irregularities.

He is obviously aligning himself with Q drops / methodoliges, but that is not independent evidence he is now legit.

Every time there is a troubling event in U.S. history, the disinfo theories are always the FIRST to go "viral" because that conditions the people to reject the legitimate investigations into the JFK / RFK / 9-11 / election fraud events. POISON THE WELL.

Who's going to take child sex trafficking seriously after Wood's claims come to nohtingburgers? Do you realize how much is at stake for TRUTH if Wood is accepted without independent verifications? BE WARY, BE CAUTIOUS

Why does Silicon Valley allow Wood to continue tweeting if he's actually dropping earth shattering truth bombs? Occam's Razor tells me it's because they know its disinfo bullshit that will deflect truth disseminations.

Would I love to be wrong about Wood? Sure, but at this point on what reasonable basis? Set emotions and hopiums aside when thinking about this.