If you wondered how the evidence from dear old Nancy's laptop was going to get entered into court the answer is that she's going to be tried by a military tribunal where the rules of evidence are very different from the rules that restrict the admissibility of evidence in federal court.
Looks like Nancy is goin' to GITMO. One way ticket.
https://www.sfgate.com/news/article/Military-tribunals-not-the-same-as-U-S-courts-3232033.php
http://www.talkleft.com/story/2003/03/16/868/22969/terrortrials/Military-Tribunals-vs-Federal-Courts
If you're posting this garbled up reference for me I'd read it before posting. It is an attempt to make tribunals appear the equal of federal courts when they are in fact not at all equal. Read more and try to absorb what you read. The differences are critical and they are why the laptops were stolen.
The stolen laptops would be inadmissible if federal courts. So why have specops scoop them? Only one reason.
Read the references I posted.
My bad, I apologize. I should have phrased it "One can learn about Military Tribunals here", so it wouldn't have been so directed at you.
Didn't mean to come across so snarky. I'm tired, I should get some sleep.