Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA
MI has the most access to mined data and classified information. They have the best information gathering tools, They also have more power in general and are devoted to the constitution. MI can take over the investigations for the other three in cases of high treason.
No approval or congressional oversight
MI does not answer to Congress
State Secrets upheld under SC
United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953)
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?
POTUS is the Commander IN Chief of the military.
The Chief is General John Kelly, POTUS' Chief of Staff, a Marine.
Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.
The Insurrection ACT allows POTUS to use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act ALL OF WHICH HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST 8 MONTHS OF TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY. Specifically, the Las Vegas massacre was a great opportunity to impose these powers -- 911 style, esp. since the cover story crumbled so quickly. The fact they didn't intervene suggests there is something going on behind the scenes.
SUMMARY
Military Intelligence v FBI, CIA, and NSA. No current approval or congressional oversight as State Secrets are upheld under Supreme Court. The POTUS can impose Military Intel take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies, but conditions must present itself. This is so VERY important.
Someone surrounds POTUS. They lost this very important power - the one area of the government not corrupt and directly serving POTUS.
extra answers
Key:
Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA
MI is not as corrupted and infested with globalist assets
MI is under the direction of POTUS ONLY, not other agencies.
MI OPS (operations) and products are protected from other corrupt agencies using STATE SECRETS powers, which the globalists gave to POTUS over the last 30 years. Now its turned on them.
No approval or congressional oversight
State Secrets upheld under SC
An evidentiary rule created by U.S. legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security. U.S. v. Reynolds, which involved military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege. Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion. The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military?
Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS.
Under provisions of both the Homeland Security Act, Military Commissions Act(s), and The PATRIOT Act, the POTUS, either via his sec, or by sending armed troops to halt the attempts to resist launched by pseudo state operative Elaine Duke, current Secretary of Homeland Security, may engage in any number of activities to halt treason by forces hostile to the United States within the Armed Forces, or cease an entire Dept of US Gov from its compromised authority. These were checks and balances to the usurption and abuse of US internal policy which, as in the case of some Sept 11 Attackers whose visas were not thoroughly vetted, where these bureacratic practices could amount to "holes" in the US statuatory armor. Also, the Pat Act gives Potus the authority to declare any group hostile to US "terrorists".
At that point, under PATRIOT Act detention is legal, and under the Military Commissions Act of 2008, the tribunals are now engageable.
SUMMARY
MI does not answer to Congress, has the most access to mined data and classified information. They have the best information gathering tools, They also have more power in general and are devoted to the constitution. MI can take over the investigations for the other three in cases of high treason. The State Secrets Act was upheld in the Supreme Court United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953) acknowledging the right of the government to exclude evidence in a trial that may harm National Security. The President is the Commander in Chief of the Military and the Chief of Staff is Gen. John Kelly, a Marine. The President can use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain.
Can't say I have this 100% correct, and it is not complete, but a basic outline goes like this --
(1) "State secrets privilege" was upheld as valid in US vs. Reynolds. This means the US government can arbitrarily claim that a department (CIA, FBI, State dept, whatever) does not have to turn over evidence in a legal case, if they simply claim "state secrets" and therefore evidence that might help the defendant is withheld.
This is a serious problem when the deep state is withholding evidence on bogus "state secrets" claims, if you are trying to prosecution a deep state operative. So, how do you prosecute, knowing important classified info will be withheld from evidence?
(2)This is why Trump had to let them get to this point, because POTUS has Article II power that is independent of Congress' Article I power. Any person who is a spy, engages in espionage, or aids a foreign country against the United States is an "unlawful combatant." This falls under POTUS' authority, not Congress' authority.
See: Ex parte Quirin (Supreme Court):
"It held that while lawful combatants may be captured and held as prisoners of war, unlawful combatants face harsher circumstances such as being sentenced to prison terms or put to death
This puts it under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not under the regular criminal code. USMJ includes:
(3) "Aiding the enemy"
"Any person who—
(1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or
(2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly;
shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct. "
(4) Is the US at war? Yes. After 9/11, war was declared on "terrorism" and that never changed. They used it to abuse the Constitution, and now it will be used against them.
(5) Also, the Marine Corps is different from any other branch. The MC's mission is to protect, defend etc. ... "or any other purpose that the President shall so direct."
Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA MI has the most access to mined data and classified information. They have the best information gathering tools, They also have more power in general and are devoted to the constitution. MI can take over the investigations for the other three in cases of high treason.
No approval or congressional oversight MI does not answer to Congress
State Secrets upheld under SC United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953)
THE STATE SECRETS PRIVILEGE and THE SUPREME COURT https://www.scribd.com/document/41747792/State-Secrets-and-the-Supreme-Court
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military? POTUS is the Commander IN Chief of the military. The Chief is General John Kelly, POTUS' Chief of Staff, a Marine. Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS. The Insurrection ACT allows POTUS to use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Insurrection_Act ALL OF WHICH HAVE HAPPENED IN THE FIRST 8 MONTHS OF TRUMP'S PRESIDENCY. Specifically, the Las Vegas massacre was a great opportunity to impose these powers -- 911 style, esp. since the cover story crumbled so quickly. The fact they didn't intervene suggests there is something going on behind the scenes.
SUMMARY Military Intelligence v FBI, CIA, and NSA. No current approval or congressional oversight as State Secrets are upheld under Supreme Court. The POTUS can impose Military Intel take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies, but conditions must present itself. This is so VERY important.
Someone surrounds POTUS. They lost this very important power - the one area of the government not corrupt and directly serving POTUS.
extra answers Key: Military Intelligence v FBI CIA NSA MI is not as corrupted and infested with globalist assets MI is under the direction of POTUS ONLY, not other agencies. MI OPS (operations) and products are protected from other corrupt agencies using STATE SECRETS powers, which the globalists gave to POTUS over the last 30 years. Now its turned on them. No approval or congressional oversight State Secrets upheld under SC An evidentiary rule created by U.S. legal precedent. Application of the privilege results in exclusion of evidence from a legal case based solely on affidavits submitted by the government stating that court proceedings might disclose sensitive information which might endanger national security. U.S. v. Reynolds, which involved military secrets, was the first case that saw formal recognition of the privilege. Following a claim of "state secrets privilege", the court rarely conducts an in camera examination of the evidence to evaluate whether there is sufficient cause to support the use of this doctrine. This results in court rulings in which even the judge has not verified the veracity of the assertion. The privileged material is completely removed from the litigation, and the court must determine how the unavailability of the privileged information affects the case. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/State_secrets_privilege
Who is the Commander and Chief of the military? Under what article can the President impose MI take over investigations for the 3 letter agencies? What conditions must present itself? Why is this so VERY important? Who surrounds POTUS? They lost this very important power _ the one area of the govt not corrupt and directly serves POTUS. Under provisions of both the Homeland Security Act, Military Commissions Act(s), and The PATRIOT Act, the POTUS, either via his sec, or by sending armed troops to halt the attempts to resist launched by pseudo state operative Elaine Duke, current Secretary of Homeland Security, may engage in any number of activities to halt treason by forces hostile to the United States within the Armed Forces, or cease an entire Dept of US Gov from its compromised authority. These were checks and balances to the usurption and abuse of US internal policy which, as in the case of some Sept 11 Attackers whose visas were not thoroughly vetted, where these bureacratic practices could amount to "holes" in the US statuatory armor. Also, the Pat Act gives Potus the authority to declare any group hostile to US "terrorists".
https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&source=web&rct=j&url=http://www.crf-usa.org/america-responds-to-terrorism/the-patriot-act.html&ved=0ahUKEwi5lZrC57vXAhUm6oMKHQ_9DtUQFggsMAE&usg=AOvVaw3ZZbNiz5OhLr-k9nNy8Yt3
At that point, under PATRIOT Act detention is legal, and under the Military Commissions Act of 2008, the tribunals are now engageable.
SUMMARY MI does not answer to Congress, has the most access to mined data and classified information. They have the best information gathering tools, They also have more power in general and are devoted to the constitution. MI can take over the investigations for the other three in cases of high treason. The State Secrets Act was upheld in the Supreme Court United States v. Reynolds, 345 U.S. 1 (1953) acknowledging the right of the government to exclude evidence in a trial that may harm National Security. The President is the Commander in Chief of the Military and the Chief of Staff is Gen. John Kelly, a Marine. The President can use military (& National Guard) as police force in the event of terrorist act, natural disasters and disorder that state police cannot contain.
https://qanon.pub/ can be useful...has many answers to drops
You rock, thank you.
Can't say I have this 100% correct, and it is not complete, but a basic outline goes like this --
(1) "State secrets privilege" was upheld as valid in US vs. Reynolds. This means the US government can arbitrarily claim that a department (CIA, FBI, State dept, whatever) does not have to turn over evidence in a legal case, if they simply claim "state secrets" and therefore evidence that might help the defendant is withheld.
This is a serious problem when the deep state is withholding evidence on bogus "state secrets" claims, if you are trying to prosecution a deep state operative. So, how do you prosecute, knowing important classified info will be withheld from evidence?
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/United_States_v._Reynolds
(2)This is why Trump had to let them get to this point, because POTUS has Article II power that is independent of Congress' Article I power. Any person who is a spy, engages in espionage, or aids a foreign country against the United States is an "unlawful combatant." This falls under POTUS' authority, not Congress' authority.
See: Ex parte Quirin (Supreme Court):
"It held that while lawful combatants may be captured and held as prisoners of war, unlawful combatants face harsher circumstances such as being sentenced to prison terms or put to death
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ex_parte_Quirin
This puts it under the Uniform Code of Military Justice, not under the regular criminal code. USMJ includes:
(3) "Aiding the enemy"
"Any person who— (1) aids, or attempts to aid, the enemy with arms, ammunition, supplies, money, or other things; or (2) without proper authority, knowingly harbors or protects or gives intelligence to, or communicates or corresponds with or holds any intercourse with the enemy, either directly or indirectly; shall suffer death or such other punishment as a court-martial or military commission may direct. "
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/10/903b
(4) Is the US at war? Yes. After 9/11, war was declared on "terrorism" and that never changed. They used it to abuse the Constitution, and now it will be used against them.
(5) Also, the Marine Corps is different from any other branch. The MC's mission is to protect, defend etc. ... "or any other purpose that the President shall so direct."
https://media1.tenor.com/images/b4a67ab17be1e0e1d1be76cecc2ca9cd/tenor.gif?itemid=15204610
nice