You heard from those who were looking for wasy to confirmation bias.
Like if you catch another man in the room with your wife, you can say "maybe he was there to fix a radiator, then wife brough him water, he spilled water on himself and that is the reason he took off his clothes">
Sure, it can be so. But why not the more plausible explnation that they were going to have sex?
Or maybe it really was recorded... you know, because it's at least a 50% chance. Were you there or something? do you have direct knowledge? What is your opinion of Lin Wood repeating this as truth?
already proven false. pope gave live mass after story came out from what i read.
I heard it was prerecorded
You heard from those who were looking for wasy to confirmation bias. Like if you catch another man in the room with your wife, you can say "maybe he was there to fix a radiator, then wife brough him water, he spilled water on himself and that is the reason he took off his clothes"> Sure, it can be so. But why not the more plausible explnation that they were going to have sex?
Or maybe it really was recorded... you know, because it's at least a 50% chance. Were you there or something? do you have direct knowledge? What is your opinion of Lin Wood repeating this as truth?
Why is it specifically 50% chance it was recorded and not 5% or 95%?
Or do you determine chances like this or that, both 50/50 ?