Throwing this out there to look at things a different way.
Could the code markers 11.3 (Podesta) and 11.4 (Huma) be based on the deployment of NG on Monday 11th of Jan?
3 days after 11th will mark next steps? (Ie. Podesta indictment on 14th Jan)
Can be said it should be 13th, but I discount the first day since it's the announcement and authorisation.
11.3 = 1.13 = 1/13/2021?
?
I like the theory. 11.3=11+3 and 11.4=11+4
You really need to research on the QRB mate.... because only then will you be able to draw any assumptions from those Q posts...
People are coming out with ideas that make no sense if you know the context of those Q posts on QRB....
Most seem to just read Q post compilation site like Qanon.pub and come up with ideas whereas those Q posts need to be considered in relation to the other Q posts and comments by Anons on that specific thread on QRB....
It’s like people are making guesses or conclusions without knowing or considering any of the context at the time those posts were made... because of that so many here are trying to come up with something that they have only thought about in isolation of those posts...
Please research before sharing because your only wasting your own time and missing so much of what many of us did years back...!!
This is the same reason why everyone got so built up about the 6th January being a marker...
Please, please go back to the boards and don’t try to decode Q posts from the Q compilation boards... those posts mean nothing without context... not just on the board but also in terms of what was happening at the time in the news etc..
It’s like people are thinking they can decode something that they only have less than half of the code and or Key...
WWG1WGA
dont date fag..when it happens it happens
We have one week left.
Interesting.
What I find frustrating is that numerology and codes are often only knowable once you have facts to fit into the picture.
Until you have some hard data points there are numerous potentialities. Of course, after the fact it could be argued as rationalisation if it weren't for all the damned co-incidences :)
Anyone looked at the relevance of when Q explicitly states “marker” in his posts?
I like this train of thought.
Could be sealed.