A Quantum Computer isn't science fiction, it is a logical idea when put into action produces actual results. Here's the skimmy on predictive algorithms:
The computer parses data from ALL of the internet. Everything being sent or being received; posted or save; snooped or spied; packets and all. Everything digital and connected to the internet or even many private networks that have been infiltrated are under the magnifying glass of the computer. That's why it has to be real big. REAL BIG.
It looks at everything, all the trends and connections. It puts pieces together trying to find what people are talking about and what threads of discussion are taking place. If someone says something here and then someone says something there and they use the same word there is a connection made. Even some nobody in Siberia who logged on to check the news and leaves a comment about his thoughts on the tin of beans he left out in the snow not tasting the same is fair game. Nothing is left out. Noise isn't just noise, it is a pattern for those with the right lens key.
By tracking movement of all internet activity, a map is made and when events occur the map lights up with activity. When you track this data over years and years you get an idea of who is contacting who. If after bean stocks go up the same signals are seen from the same players then you know they likely have had a hand in it. Look at the clock and see if it happens on a regular timeline and you can predict the next time bean stocks will go up. Once you can gauge reliability of the event, you can compare it to other events. If the stock price of beans correlates to the number of whales hunted in the northern Pacific this year, even if it seems unrelated, then you know there is something going on.
Patterns are found. Patterns are remembered. Patterns predict the future.
There isn't any magic to it. It is a natural element of information gathering. Everything is connected, even if at first glance there is no logical path for them to be. The saying "What does that have to do with the price of eggs in China?" is a reality. Everything has an affects everything else in some way or another. The Quantum computer is an attempt to put the puzzle together with a clearly displayed margin of error.
You don't even need AI or neural networks to get it done either. Just algorithms. Raw and tested code that executes without flaw and has predictable results and a % likelihood of occurrence. That, and a SHIT TON of CPUs.
This goes far off, but I saw a video about Looking Glass on Bitchute. If interested (take it with a big grain of salt) here's the link. Watch closely at the 11:10+ mark.
Q themselves is not a computer.... the Q team might be using one... but you only have to read the Q posts to understand that Q could not be a computer...
I won’t waste my time explaining why.... you can do some real research for yourself or you can look for the threads on here from yesterday that I answered to the same theory... There were 3 threads yesterday discussing the same theory and numerous going back over the last 3 years...
Would help no end if people stopped rushing to be clever and instead actually used their brain and did some basic research...
I'm inclined to believe that Q is a think tank recruited and/or staffed with military personnel that have access to a Quantum computer.
Parts of the raw output of the computer may be in parts of Q's messages. They are then added to with cryptic messages to expound on the raw output.
My theory is we are basically looking at the noise before the Quantum Computer compiles it to a final predictive summary. We are looking at the pile of IKEA parts while the Q team has the final furniture piece put together by the computer.
In other words, they give us the noisy, raw data and have us recreate the final actions of the computer manually. We are tasked with manually acting out the last procedure in the Quantum computer's pipeline.
I was just thinking something to this affect.
A Quantum Computer isn't science fiction, it is a logical idea when put into action produces actual results. Here's the skimmy on predictive algorithms:
The computer parses data from ALL of the internet. Everything being sent or being received; posted or save; snooped or spied; packets and all. Everything digital and connected to the internet or even many private networks that have been infiltrated are under the magnifying glass of the computer. That's why it has to be real big. REAL BIG.
It looks at everything, all the trends and connections. It puts pieces together trying to find what people are talking about and what threads of discussion are taking place. If someone says something here and then someone says something there and they use the same word there is a connection made. Even some nobody in Siberia who logged on to check the news and leaves a comment about his thoughts on the tin of beans he left out in the snow not tasting the same is fair game. Nothing is left out. Noise isn't just noise, it is a pattern for those with the right lens key.
By tracking movement of all internet activity, a map is made and when events occur the map lights up with activity. When you track this data over years and years you get an idea of who is contacting who. If after bean stocks go up the same signals are seen from the same players then you know they likely have had a hand in it. Look at the clock and see if it happens on a regular timeline and you can predict the next time bean stocks will go up. Once you can gauge reliability of the event, you can compare it to other events. If the stock price of beans correlates to the number of whales hunted in the northern Pacific this year, even if it seems unrelated, then you know there is something going on.
Patterns are found. Patterns are remembered. Patterns predict the future.
There isn't any magic to it. It is a natural element of information gathering. Everything is connected, even if at first glance there is no logical path for them to be. The saying "What does that have to do with the price of eggs in China?" is a reality. Everything has an affects everything else in some way or another. The Quantum computer is an attempt to put the puzzle together with a clearly displayed margin of error.
You don't even need AI or neural networks to get it done either. Just algorithms. Raw and tested code that executes without flaw and has predictable results and a % likelihood of occurrence. That, and a SHIT TON of CPUs.
Chums Up....
https://youtu.be/yOMj7WttkOA (5 sec)
This goes far off, but I saw a video about Looking Glass on Bitchute. If interested (take it with a big grain of salt) here's the link. Watch closely at the 11:10+ mark.
https://www.bitchute.com/video/xzrr1jBfRGM8/
Q themselves is not a computer.... the Q team might be using one... but you only have to read the Q posts to understand that Q could not be a computer...
I won’t waste my time explaining why.... you can do some real research for yourself or you can look for the threads on here from yesterday that I answered to the same theory... There were 3 threads yesterday discussing the same theory and numerous going back over the last 3 years...
Would help no end if people stopped rushing to be clever and instead actually used their brain and did some basic research...
WWG1WGA
I'm inclined to believe that Q is a think tank recruited and/or staffed with military personnel that have access to a Quantum computer.
Parts of the raw output of the computer may be in parts of Q's messages. They are then added to with cryptic messages to expound on the raw output.
My theory is we are basically looking at the noise before the Quantum Computer compiles it to a final predictive summary. We are looking at the pile of IKEA parts while the Q team has the final furniture piece put together by the computer.
In other words, they give us the noisy, raw data and have us recreate the final actions of the computer manually. We are tasked with manually acting out the last procedure in the Quantum computer's pipeline.
According to Simon Parkes' own "Q" source, the Q team comprises four people and a quantum computer.
So, OP, you are thinking along the same lines as Parkes & co.