I worked for several of the large global consulting firms. We analyzed every RFQ, bid, contract, and eventually workplans in excruciating detail using methods that influence and were influenced by military planning techniques. And why not? These firms are part of the Swamp TBH.
We made "decision trees" mapping out every conceivable variation in the course of our giant projects. Each "branch" was evaluated for risk to success in terms of cost and time, and sometimes reputation. The granularity is insane and every one of those lines was peer-reviewed several times and had supporting evidence from our own archives.
WHAT IF Q DROPS ARE LINE-ITEMS FROM A MASSIVE DECISION TREE?
This would certainly explain the "time traveler" paradoxes!
In this idea, Q would post selected lines from the decision tree on trigger dates based on their own logic flow. Over several years, most of the tree would be published as drops.
As events transpire, Q team communicates to anons by provoking research into the relevant breadcrumb by date, delta, content, anything included in their "learn our comms" hints.
WE HAVE MORE THAN WE KNOW means we have the whole decision tree, or at least the primary nodes.
There is no Project Looking Glass time lens in use, just a path along a pre-analyzed decision tree. As events transpire certain branches are excluded and we progress along the tree to the end state.
Q signals (a joke for ham radio ops) let us know we are still holding to the plan.
Presumably Q's decision tree is a gazillion times more granular than our consulting firm analyses as a simple matter of the stakes and available resources.
Intelligence is key to the success of the plan so all contingencies can be analysed and addressed with action in near real time.
But make no mistake: breadcrumbs, drops, and various Q-signals tell us the Plan remains active and, if we had access to it, we would know exactly where we are in its execution.
Or at least that's the idea I had yesterday while watching X22 Report, my daily morale boosting exercise in hopium.
Or a room full of very smart people, brainstorming!
I think this is completely plausible. I have been spending some time thinking about how all this is even possible. The planning would have to be something beyond most of our comprehension.
Honestly, I still had some small lingering doubts about Q (I'm new to Q) due to the seemingly omnipotent nature in which people seem to place on them, but this 100% dispels any lingering doubts I have about Q. This makes a lot of sense.
Great analysis.
One of the better explanations I've seen.
I’ve always thought of the Looking Glass as advanced war-gaming assisted by quantum computing. I think that’s consistent with your idea of a decision tree. It’s a giant game of chess with thousands of moves and counter moves.
This may explain the "Trust Sessions" in earlier Q drops
This assumed Sessions wasn't replaced, and he eventually was
Yes, that's what I think. Sessions had to go for whatever reason so the "Sessions" branch was pruned and , oh, "Contingency Sessions 3a.1 was executed. The Plan itself continues apace.
AJ is who I tune in to when I feel demoralized. Good guy or psy-op, there's nothing more uplifting than him screaming about the frogs turning gay while making uncomfortable eye contact with the camera haha. Honestly, if he was a psy-op, I would imagine that it wouldn't be by choice, unfortunately. We will soon know
edit-a word
AJ can put out good stuff, but is used as the "crazy tinfoil hat" that media points to so that stuff can be discredited.
I've taken to imagining "Q" to be like "No 1" on The Prisoner but a good guy and not so scary-ugly https://prisoner.fandom.com/wiki/Number_1
Butterfly War.
How do you counter a narrative that doesn't make sense unless you are knee deep in it?
GOOD QUESTION !