Ummmm this is pretty big deal https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xh7MNkYr3lQ
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (30)
sorted by:
Ok interesting right but. ask yourself this. If Project Veritas was privy to this information and drop date and edited the video to drop to correlate the the corresponding Q dump. one glaringly hard question is this. The video captured was on 1/8/2021. That is pretty easy to achieve from a production point of you. But... the "insider" that obtained video of this, to be in the upper eschelons of twitter meeting and speak directly to the co-founder CEO of this company (twitter) be at that level to even be present to hear what is being discussed and then...... record it, supposedly be a whistle blower to said content and then post with a third party content provider, Project Veritas, and then line up with the obvious Q dump goodbye@Jack, which is clearly evidence to end this platform violating their Sect. 230 protections by admitting on video no adherence to publishing or control of narrative from a free speech perspective. NO I am sorry that is not amazing strategic thinking. This is more, much more, too many moving parts and perspective and timing and analogies to minimize what this is and represents, the current catalyst of the down fall of a powerful worldwide organization platform and social media outlet not adhering to provisions providing paramount protection from our government!
I believe God is Allknowing.
Q says "God wins."
Ask yourself why.
A conversation recorded on the 8th won't be leaked on the 8th...this isn't the case where in the CNN tapes they just got a Zoom link. From my understanding an insider recorded it and sent them over security the file. That person needed to research where to leak it to, how to send it over, go through the mental side of losing their job, etc.
Doesn't seem out of the realm of possibility that those in government knowing the logical events happening would be able to predict the date.
Also the source have easily asked for a specific date (or Veritas being told to release on a certain date by a government source they have). Perhaps in cahoots with the government.
For the 'cogs in the wheel' piece: Doesn't require many people involved. Just the upper echelon of the military, Trump, SoS, Comms manager, and maybe 1-3 more in his admin.
Lets not go crazy and start putting this Q in the box of religion. Makes a lot more sense that the admin is just trying to validate their plan with individuals outside of government covertly, as if the government does go to military control they need civilians to not freak the fuck out.
Are you saying the recording pre-dates the Q post? I don't think @Jack had that hobo beard back then. Maybe I'm wrong. (Phonefagging)