The media is nonetheless insisting Trump 'incited' the pre-planned attack with cliche political lines used repeatedly by even Democrats like 'take our country back' and 'fight'; after all such common political speeches in the past, there were no riots. - Incitement: a timeline of Trump's inflammatory rhetoric before the Capitol riot
The riot was "deadly" (as opposed to aftermath) due to what appears to be a deliberate, organized breach by agitators that led to shooting of one person: Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt. Watch full, unedited video and decide for yourself.
Mainstream media worked to delegitimize Trump presidency for years with the Russia hoax; no social media suspensions, no firings for pushing fake news (in fact, some received 'journalism' awards). - Mueller Report Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion
Hillary Clinton told Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances,' but media slam Trump for not conceding. Clinton claimed Republicans could try to “mess up absentee balloting,” however, such ballot rejections were historically low. - Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'
President Trump not only specifically told those who attended his speech to "peacefully" protest before march to Capitol (siege began before marchers could have reached it), he explicitly disavowed violence and anyone who carries it out in his name. - Trump disavows violence, says free speech under assault
Americans are drowning in propaganda to an extent never been seen in our nation's history. At the same time, there is a major push to quell dissent and free speech. We must seek ways to share the truth to counteract the rising threat that propaganda poses to our country.
"Hillary Clinton told Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances,' but media slam Trump for not conceding. "
I just realised something, the left didn't expect to win the election. Let me explain.
Let's assume they had the system rigged for Hillary in 2016, but the white hats interfered and ensured Trump was elected.
Democrats cried fowl, but couldn't accuse Trump because that would bring scrutiny upon their own actions - so they did the next best thing - accused Russia of interfering on Trump's behalf. We all know how that ended.
Now, fast forward to 2020. The Democrats were going to rig the election again, but I suspect they thought DJT was going to pull the same trick on them, so they were preparing the public for Biden to lose and then claim DJT actually stole the election - I bet you they had 'evidence' all ready to go for that outcome.
When DJT didn't interfere the way they thought he would, their efforts then stood out like a sore thumb and I think they were wrong-footed, hence all the mistakes they've made since.
There are problems with this argument I admit, but it's a possible scenario - otherwise why would the Dems go on about Biden not conceding?
I've wondered a lot recently why the same laws about calling in fake bomb threats etc dont apply to fake stories like this. Or hysterics about some new covid mutation. Or dire warnings about climate change, supremacists, nazis, eating meat, right wing recruiting and radicalisation on the internet.. all the leftists tropes, all sans evidence and not passing any critical analysis.
Print and TV media a long time can commit essentially infinite slander just as long as they add a retraction buried in the back pages somewhere with tiny font a couple of days later.
And every one of these nonsense stories will be used to spruik specific sections of the stock market, for people who have the advantage of knowing about the stories before they are released making a financial killing each time. The rothchilds stole all england based on this strategy during the napoleonic wars so its one hell of a crime motivation.
Reforming the publisher/platform laws is needed, but this loophole via which so much crime is occurring also needs to be shut.
Capitol Hill siege pre-planned (meaning Trump could not have incited it with speech he was impeached over) - F.B.I. report is said to have warned of plans for violence at the Capitol.
The media is nonetheless insisting Trump 'incited' the pre-planned attack with cliche political lines used repeatedly by even Democrats like 'take our country back' and 'fight'; after all such common political speeches in the past, there were no riots. - Incitement: a timeline of Trump's inflammatory rhetoric before the Capitol riot
Evidence is scant/non-existent of rioters' plot to "capture/kill" lawmakers, despite earlier reports to the contrary. - US takes back its assertion that Capitol rioters wanted to 'capture and assassinate' officials
At least some pro-Antifa/BLM activists among rioters (one went on CNN); mounds of evidence that crowd called out and tried to stop left-wing agitators (like shouting "fuck Antifa* during break-in; Trump supporters thwarted agitators on camera) - BLM activist egged on Capitol rioters: Left-winger who told CNN he was there simply to document the siege is arrested after video shows he smashed window, wore gas mask, told rioters he had knife and shouted 'we got to get this s**t burned'
The riot was "deadly" (as opposed to aftermath) due to what appears to be a deliberate, organized breach by agitators that led to shooting of one person: Trump supporter Ashli Babbitt. Watch full, unedited video and decide for yourself.
Parler was singled out by Amazon for supposedly allowing violent incitement to spread on its platform, but the evidence shows that much of the planning was carried out on Facebook. Facebook Played Major Role Coordinating ‘Capitol Riot’ As Sandberg Deflects Blame
Democrats and media outlets suggest Republicans should 'resign' for Electoral College objections. Such objections are entirely constitutional and a practice Democrats used in 2000, 2004, 2016 (Trump's election). - Democrats who praised 2004 objections to Electoral College certification now slam Hawley
Mainstream media worked to delegitimize Trump presidency for years with the Russia hoax; no social media suspensions, no firings for pushing fake news (in fact, some received 'journalism' awards). - Mueller Report Finds No Evidence Of Russian Collusion
Hillary Clinton told Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances,' but media slam Trump for not conceding. Clinton claimed Republicans could try to “mess up absentee balloting,” however, such ballot rejections were historically low. - Hillary Clinton says Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances'
The media is uncritically reporting an FBI advisery 'armed uprisings' are now planned for all 50 state capitols. It is not demanding specific intelligence for what groups have the logistical capacity to carry out such attacks. - FBI memo warns law enforcement across U.S. of possible armed protests at 50 state capitols
President Trump not only specifically told those who attended his speech to "peacefully" protest before march to Capitol (siege began before marchers could have reached it), he explicitly disavowed violence and anyone who carries it out in his name. - Trump disavows violence, says free speech under assault
Americans are drowning in propaganda to an extent never been seen in our nation's history. At the same time, there is a major push to quell dissent and free speech. We must seek ways to share the truth to counteract the rising threat that propaganda poses to our country.
"Hillary Clinton told Biden should not concede the election 'under any circumstances,' but media slam Trump for not conceding. "
I just realised something, the left didn't expect to win the election. Let me explain.
Let's assume they had the system rigged for Hillary in 2016, but the white hats interfered and ensured Trump was elected.
Democrats cried fowl, but couldn't accuse Trump because that would bring scrutiny upon their own actions - so they did the next best thing - accused Russia of interfering on Trump's behalf. We all know how that ended.
Now, fast forward to 2020. The Democrats were going to rig the election again, but I suspect they thought DJT was going to pull the same trick on them, so they were preparing the public for Biden to lose and then claim DJT actually stole the election - I bet you they had 'evidence' all ready to go for that outcome.
When DJT didn't interfere the way they thought he would, their efforts then stood out like a sore thumb and I think they were wrong-footed, hence all the mistakes they've made since.
There are problems with this argument I admit, but it's a possible scenario - otherwise why would the Dems go on about Biden not conceding?
I've wondered a lot recently why the same laws about calling in fake bomb threats etc dont apply to fake stories like this. Or hysterics about some new covid mutation. Or dire warnings about climate change, supremacists, nazis, eating meat, right wing recruiting and radicalisation on the internet.. all the leftists tropes, all sans evidence and not passing any critical analysis.
Print and TV media a long time can commit essentially infinite slander just as long as they add a retraction buried in the back pages somewhere with tiny font a couple of days later.
And every one of these nonsense stories will be used to spruik specific sections of the stock market, for people who have the advantage of knowing about the stories before they are released making a financial killing each time. The rothchilds stole all england based on this strategy during the napoleonic wars so its one hell of a crime motivation.
Reforming the publisher/platform laws is needed, but this loophole via which so much crime is occurring also needs to be shut.
unruley crowd (some) a few broken windows. and planned....far from a riot...compare it to Portland, Seattle and milwalkee
Like $2000 in damages vs $2 billion? Clearly the $2000 is worse
At this point the idiots who believe that shit shouldn't even be bothered