I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
Where was there any semblance of dooming in my comment that you responded to?
"that the odds of it being a coincidence are astronomically low."
Yeah, as in, it's virtually certain that Trump's farewell speech was intentionally linked to #1947.
Again, how is that dooming? Because I'm saying it's 99.9 ... 9 percent certain instead if 100 percent certain? What?
I could be retarded, I'll be the first to admit I'm wrong if I am. But wouldn't astronomically low odds of it being a coincidence suggest that you think it's more likely a coincidence than it actually being something important?
No lol. Sorry for the misunderstanding. By astronomically low chances of it being a coincidence I mean very very very low chances of it being a coincidence.
You're not retarded. You just sent me down a rabbit hole of Googling grammar online.
So, astronomical without the low added would default to a very very high value. I've used, heard, and found online the usage of astronomically low to denote a very small quantity. With astronomical acting as a modifier to low, it'd be like saying enormously low. But, apparently, that's improper -- the proper word choice would be infinitesimal. So, thanks to you I learned a new thing today, and I learned that I (and others) have been using the phrase improperly for a long time. That's embarrassing.
Bro, go grab another cup of covfefe.
Your brain isn't working right.
He's not dooming.
Not hating on ya; the past few weeks has been like drinking from Niagara Falls, there's so much info; it's easy to get confused & take stuff out of context, no matter how sharp you are.
u/orlando_pede is NOT dooming; he's awesome.
?
holy shit you are literally retarded. Low chance of coincidence = deliberate ffs