Fucking... Probably. It would be unprecedented for the same court to so blatantly play politics in such a short time, I'd imagine, but then again... I feel that pedophiles serving as chief justice is unprecedented as well.
They can if they find that some of the justices were compromised during the case. The new Justices are only bound by precedent via precedent. They have every right to re-rule on past cases if they see something egregious was overlooked.
Can they re-rule on that?
Fucking... Probably. It would be unprecedented for the same court to so blatantly play politics in such a short time, I'd imagine, but then again... I feel that pedophiles serving as chief justice is unprecedented as well.
Updoot fren.
They can if they find that some of the justices were compromised during the case. The new Justices are only bound by precedent via precedent. They have every right to re-rule on past cases if they see something egregious was overlooked.
So then, signing EO's you know will reside in enemy territory would be really foolish.
Trump isn't foolish.
I'm not sure I follow.
Given the current climate of corruption within our judiciary, I don't see relying on it, as sound planning.