I'm copying my comment from a different post with the same picture:
There is no such thing in chess at all.
Chess "moves" are things like "Knight to f6", aka moving a single piece in a single step. If the above strategy were true, it would be called a "gambit" not a "move".
"Castling" exists which is the only move to involve 2 pieces, and it's where the rook (not rock) seemingly passes through and switches places with the King to protect it - but there are a bunch of special rules regarding its availability, and it's a very basic move which is used in almost in every match, definitely not a secret weapon.
Pawns cannot move backwards
Backing your king into a corner is a surefire way to get checkmated unless you are building a "fortress" (which is a real strategy) and hope to achieve a stalemate (aka a draw) by having no legal moves. It is a way to avoid defeat but neither side wins in such a situation.
Players cannot checkmate themselves
Chess has an extensively studied theory and every named situation has a specific time and place. Game openings are sometimes studied 20 moves into a match and every branch is named, like "Richter-Rauzer attack of the Sicilian Defense". If you see some kind of theory with vague details promising grand results you can be 100% sure it's a chess LARP. Not to mention, if there were any such "secret strategy" then it would have been analyzed to death 50 year ago by some Soviet Grandmaster.
Everything in this instagram post is wrong, and it's as if someone tried to stuff as much misinformation into one as possible. Even people who have never played chess should be able to see through such bullshit. Stop posting this, it makes you look stupid
I haven't played chess in a long time but I remember 'castling' where your king and rook basically swap places.
I'm copying my comment from a different post with the same picture:
There is no such thing in chess at all.
Chess "moves" are things like "Knight to f6", aka moving a single piece in a single step. If the above strategy were true, it would be called a "gambit" not a "move".
"Castling" exists which is the only move to involve 2 pieces, and it's where the rook (not rock) seemingly passes through and switches places with the King to protect it - but there are a bunch of special rules regarding its availability, and it's a very basic move which is used in almost in every match, definitely not a secret weapon.
Pawns cannot move backwards
Backing your king into a corner is a surefire way to get checkmated unless you are building a "fortress" (which is a real strategy) and hope to achieve a stalemate (aka a draw) by having no legal moves. It is a way to avoid defeat but neither side wins in such a situation.
Players cannot checkmate themselves
Chess has an extensively studied theory and every named situation has a specific time and place. Game openings are sometimes studied 20 moves into a match and every branch is named, like "Richter-Rauzer attack of the Sicilian Defense". If you see some kind of theory with vague details promising grand results you can be 100% sure it's a chess LARP. Not to mention, if there were any such "secret strategy" then it would have been analyzed to death 50 year ago by some Soviet Grandmaster.
Everything in this instagram post is wrong, and it's as if someone tried to stuff as much misinformation into one as possible. Even people who have never played chess should be able to see through such bullshit. Stop posting this, it makes you look stupid
FWIW: I know this is not the actual 'Castle Rock' from the Q posts.
I'm just highlighting the similarities that are possibly going on right now.
Absolutely.
But the whole concept described does correlate a little bit.