that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
No, you have to consider the source. I've looked at 30 new profiles this morning, each under 15 posts. All are doing the same thing. Hitting the ground running with some/all of same talking points -
You are a cult / worried about your mental health, get you to see reason
I was a Qanon follower
I just started following Qanon
I believed it until Biden was inaugurated
We did nothing, Q lied to us and kept us passive
Trump sold us out, it was nothing more than a money grab.
This forum is a honey pot, they have all of our names
I am going to check out of politics, have wasted too many hours here
Username seems off, check posting history if unsure (thanks u/Choctaw)
You get the idea, none of the above is spontaneous.
Ugh, that idea that Trump is a grifter and just doing ALL this as a "money grab" is so absurd it's discouraging to listen to shills repeat than nonsense.
"I just started following QAnon" -> while risky, isn't it worth maybe giving this one a chance? Maybe some people are honestly confused and looking for an explanation, and trying to learn.
for new people the only talking point is that they think QAnon have been proven to be wrong so its natural that a lot of posts are going to look the same. Articles are being posted in MSM now. A lot of normal people still haven't heard about Q, even now
No one should be abusive but it is interesting to many to wonder if Q people have now had some serious thoughts about whether they've been dramatically mislead
isn't that just generating an echo chamber where your ideas can't be challenged? doesn't sound very mentally healthy
There is a difference between name calling and a well formed argument and counter argument.
Calling names isn't an argument.
No one here is suggesting that challenging ideas should be banned. That is encouraged. I love playing devil's advocate.
Name calling and "you were so stupid to believe that!" isn't an argument.
that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
If you don't support Q you should be fine bring here asking questions as long as you aren't being an asshole
i agree with that sentiment, but that's not what the rule says. i think it should be changed to only ban trolls/assholes
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
Thanks for playing.
IDK--what, at this point, isn't it pretty well proved that Q isn't legit? Or is that what u meant?
That's rich coming from safespace-r-us.
No, you have to consider the source. I've looked at 30 new profiles this morning, each under 15 posts. All are doing the same thing. Hitting the ground running with some/all of same talking points -
You are a cult / worried about your mental health, get you to see reason
I was a Qanon follower
I just started following Qanon
I believed it until Biden was inaugurated
We did nothing, Q lied to us and kept us passive
Trump sold us out, it was nothing more than a money grab.
This forum is a honey pot, they have all of our names
I am going to check out of politics, have wasted too many hours here
Username seems off, check posting history if unsure (thanks u/Choctaw)
You get the idea, none of the above is spontaneous.
Ugh, that idea that Trump is a grifter and just doing ALL this as a "money grab" is so absurd it's discouraging to listen to shills repeat than nonsense.
Need to add to that list: new usernames that are intentionally retarded, sexual in nature, and disrespectful
Or over the top - u/SuperEagleMAGA1776TrumpForever
"I just started following QAnon" -> while risky, isn't it worth maybe giving this one a chance? Maybe some people are honestly confused and looking for an explanation, and trying to learn.
I get the reasoning behind the rest.
Lurking is cool.
for new people the only talking point is that they think QAnon have been proven to be wrong so its natural that a lot of posts are going to look the same. Articles are being posted in MSM now. A lot of normal people still haven't heard about Q, even now
They aren't legitimately challenging anything. They are mentally unhealthy. Why should we tolerate that? Serious question
No one should be abusive but it is interesting to many to wonder if Q people have now had some serious thoughts about whether they've been dramatically mislead
says the tranny?