that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
1.5. Do not "discuss" as they frequently request that you do.
isn't that just generating an echo chamber where your ideas can't be challenged? doesn't sound very mentally healthy
There is a difference between name calling and a well formed argument and counter argument.
Calling names isn't an argument.
No one here is suggesting that challenging ideas should be banned. That is encouraged. I love playing devil's advocate.
Name calling and "you were so stupid to believe that!" isn't an argument.
that explicitly states non-Q supporters aren't allowed, regardless of if they want to civilly discuss things. either the rule should be changed, or this is an echo chamber
It is not an echo chamber. If this was about Harry Potter and people wanted to keep discussing Lord of the Rings, they would be shown the door.
This is for discussions about Q drops and news that is relatable to Q, not whether or not we think Q is legit. Those days are over. If you want to discuss that, there are places you can go.
Thanks for playing.