1384 days from now, it will be 11.4 (2024) not only does to lead to Q post 1384 which is a mindblower, and NOT ONLY is this day after election day in 2024, BUT 11.4 comes after 11.3 from the DoD Manual (Obviously). If you're up to date on info, you'd know that 11.3 is the first marker to look for. let me copy paste what section 11.4 says below This looks very much like it relates to the temporary military occupancy of DC.
11.4 LEGAL POSITION OF THE OCCUPYING POWER Military occupation of enemy territory involves a complicated, trilateral set of legal relations between the Occupying Power, the temporarily ousted sovereign authority, and the inhabitants of occupied territory.92 The fact of occupation gives the Occupying Power the right to govern enemy territory temporarily, but does not transfer sovereignty over occupied territory to the Occupying Power.
11.4.1 Right of the Occupying Power to Govern the Enemy Territory Temporarily. The right to govern the territory of the enemy during its military occupation is one of the incidents of war. By the fact of occupation (i.e., the Occupying Power’s established power over occupied territory),* the Occupying Power is conferred the authority to exercise some of the rights of sovereignty. The exercise of these sovereign rights also results from the necessity of maintaining law and order, indispensable both to the inhabitants and to the occupying force, and the failure or inability of the legitimate government to exercise its functions, or the undesirability of allowing it to do so.
11.4.2 Limitations on the Power of the Occupying Power Stemming From Its Lack of Sovereignty Over Occupied Territory. Belligerent occupation in a foreign war, being based upon the possession of enemy territory, necessarily implies that the sovereignty of the occupied territory is not vested in the Occupying Power. Occupation is essentially provisional. Because sovereignty is not vested in the Occupying Power, the fact of military occupation does not authorize the Occupying Power to take certain actions. For example, the Occupying Power is not authorized by the fact of belligerent occupation to annex occupied territory or to create a new State. In addition, the Occupying Power may not compel the inhabitants of occupied territory to become its nationals or otherwise to swear allegiance to it. Similarly, in view of the provisional nature of belligerent occupation, the authority of the Occupying Power under occupation law has been interpreted as being subject to limitations on the ability of the Occupying Power to alter institutions of government permanently or change the constitution of a country.
https://dod.defense.gov/Portals/1/Documents/law_war_manual15.pdf Pompeo Tweet: https://twitter.com/mikepompeo/status/1352274074886680579
In this context it makes sense why the Dems were suddenly pushing for DC to become the 51st state.
didnt know that!
1,384 days before March 4th is May 20th, 2017 - when Trump first began his tour in Saudi Arabia.
GC = Geneva Convention
Q said "infiltration not invasion."
Do you think that means we are now occupied by the enemy (China)? I mean the Occupying Power is China.
We need to brainstorm what will trigger 11.3 please get some autists.
Some thoughts for consideration:
Drop 4621
Clinesmith's sentencing will be on Day 10 (Friday, 1/29/2021), if you assume that inauguration day was Day 1 of Darkness,
Biden represents China. China is belligerent
some dementia patients exhibit beliigerance
Don’t forget they want to give statehood to Guam and Puerto Rico too. GOP is dead.
It doesn’t matter if the GOP is dead. They’re all swamp rats anyway.
You had a near dead GOP brought back to power by Trump. What did the GOP do to thank him? Betray him.
Agreed. Patriot party is where we are heading.
A "Patriot Party" can bypass these efforts by sending people into these areas to convince people to vote for a Patriot candidate. People in most of these territories tend to live conservative lifestyles. There is no reason a right leaning Party should not appeal to them, but the Republicans brand is damaged with these people. At the very least, a new Party may steal these constituencies from the Democrats if this is done correctly.
Any "party" or candidate without a solid working knowledge of our Constitution is worthless. We either have a supreme law of the land which binds down our public servants with the chains of the Constitution or we have merely more of the same nonsense. This includes our real history that we can actually learn from instead the lies from the enemy that have passed for education for many years.