I'm requesting advice from the old-timers regarding topics on this board NOT promoted/mentioned by Q. I apologize for the long post but I think this is important for those who are in my same predicament regarding Q-research vs conspiracy theories that harm our noble goals.
I retired from a 60 hr/wk job at the beginning of 2020. COVID hit w/in a couple of weeks and I was pissed that a lot of my plans were ruined. I had a feeling COVID was a hoax so I started researching COVID specifically since I had a lot of free time. I heard mention of "Q" a couple of times in 2019 but had no idea what "Q" was. Fast forward to 2020 and I start running across videos on YouTube that mention Q. Ahhh..OK. I branched into watching a lot of those as well. I ended up getting red-pilled too quickly but after a few weeks I started thinking...some of these people in the videos are full of shit.
I shut off YouTube, quit going to all the kook sites, grabbed a notebook, and started reading all the Q-drops from #1-present day while researching the drops specifically and taking notes. Then it all clicked. I soon confirmed to myself that many of the people making those videos never read a damn thing Q said or grossly misinterpreted/embellished things. I could see the big picture overall. I did not need or care so much about proofs, dates, etc. If anything, the Q-drops presented themselves to me as one bad-ass study guide about why things are the way they are. Cool.
I could not use social media for the past twenty years. I was a cop and my former Sheriff had a team of snitches that would actually search out employees' Facebooks and social media and then discipline them for "inappropriate comments" or even "liking" someone else's comment that they deemed "inappropriate". (Remember that old Planet of the Apes meme that looked like Valerie Jarrett? My buddy ended up on the local news and was suspended for several months for clicking "like" on that meme b/c they said it was "racist".) I can't keep my mouth shut so I never participated in any forum or social media until very recently. I am thankful I stayed away from social media for most of my life b/c I soon realized how retarded and gullible many people can be. Especially the group-thinkers. I would seriously be dooming right now otherwise.
B/c I researched the Q-drops independently, my brain was not corrupted by everyone's "hopium", "doom", and other dumb shit. B/c of this, I have no doubt the Biden Admin will be short for this earth. I don't care about the timeline, Q pointed me in the right direction, I researched, I know Q will sometimes purposely give misinfo, and I feel Trump/Q made the right moves that will eventually make everything right. No problem there. I got the 40,000 foot view and I have felt I was months ahead of any news outlet to the point I cringed when they finally reported on something that many of us had known forever. (And I have only been researching Q for about a year now.) Yall get the point.
Here's my problem. I need some advice from the old-timers that have been around from the beginning or earlier:
B/c I looked at Q primarily through my own research and never actively participated in forums, chans, kun, etc., I was surprised to see a lot of people on this board talking about the same fantastical things that Q never ever mentions, or if Q mentions it at all, it is rather vague. Here are a few examples:
NESARA/GESARA: This crowd always goes on about the utopia to come. I have never seen Q mention it once. Q mentioned the gold standard coming back. Q hints at making the banking system less centralized and more fair. I never saw a single drop mention NES/GES. All those NES/GES sites either try to sell you gold & silver and/or have a New Age theme to them. My observations/pattern recognition. Am I missing something obvious?
The latest one I have seen popping back up with a vengeance around here is the CORPORATION OF THE UNITED STATES crowd. Almost 5,000 drops and I never heard Q mention this one time. Q mentions the Vatican / City of London / DC. Sure. But not "ADMIRALITY LAW" and "CONSTITUTION OF EIGHTEEN-SEVENTYwhatever". I ran across it a few times early on while researching other stuff. What I noticed is 5 different people/articles/vids will give you ten different explanations. I see Q constantly posting about restoring the Constitution but never about this stuff. These sites usually don't have the New Age themes as much but they still try to sell you some precious metals. Am I missing something obvious?
I have seen a lot of people claiming to be "Q-supporters/podcasters" talking about miracle medicinal cure-alls and regeneration machines. (When Trump gets back in we will have no more cancer on earth.) When the f*ck did Q mention this? Did I miss something? Q hinted that RBG might have been kept alive longer by medicines not available to the public. Q even mentioned (I believe) the possibility of eventually seeing alternative advanced forms of energy. Q even vaguely hinted at extra-terrestrial life but only because of the vastness of the universe. Nothing specific. However, I see a bunch of people falling for the Robert David Steele types. I like to keep an eye on some of these guys and I'll force myself to watch some of their videos. Amongst a lot of other BS, Steele once claimed that we are sending kids to Mars on a "twenty year ride" to work as off-planet slaves. Really? Come on. Don't even get me started on all those YouTubers/podcasters (including Steele) that constantly have inside info and "un-named sources". That shit pisses me off and I see people fall for it left and right. My friend sent me a Simon Parks vid recently and I instantly sent him back the "alien mother" vid with the reply: "Really. You believe this guy?"
For you long-time researchers (Q-researchers), am I way off here or are some people just gullible and/or filled on too much "hopium"? On one hand I feel my personal research benefited by not engaging much in forums/chans/social media. It certainly helped me not to fall into the "doomer crowd". I quickly realized that if lot of those "doomers" read even a fraction of Q's posts, they would be feeling pretty good right now. On the other hand, did I do myself a disservice by going out of my way to avoid the opinions of others?
Disclaimer In no way am I attacking this forum. There are a lot of really bright folks on here. It just seems that for every nugget of gold, I end up running across 10 pounds of sh*t. :) I'm all in on the plan. I just think it would help if more people actually read it.
Thoughts?
I think researching the source material directly and independently is the correct approach regardless of context. Discussion in a public forum is used to test your theories and refine them. Ultimately I think most people don't have the time to do this and just end up parroting whatever refills their hopium supply. The USA corporation thing is the latest example of this and literally came out of nowhere.
To say the USA corporation thing "literally came out of nowhere," is strange. Are you sure? Is it possible that what came out of "nowhere" is your awareness to this information.
It seems there is an epidemic of people discounting information or facts because such information is new, not being covered by the MSM, or even contrary to the popular or main stream narrative.
If a narrative supports a person's perspective, it easy for them to embrace and similarly, if information undermines a person's understanding, it easy for them to dismiss. That's when you find the messenger being attacked, because you cannot attack the message.
But opening your mind and learning new things is not always easy. While, from your perspective the United States as a corporation "literally came out of nowhere," have you considered that others have been aware of it for far longer than you?
Isn't it reasonable that difficult things to understand or accept take a long time to get traction?
I am not telling you what to believe, I am just suggesting your perspective that the United States as a corporation "came out of nowhere," may just be that, your perspective, while others may have been fully aware of it for a very long time.
Again, remember Q asked questions for others to find answers to open their minds and learn that which seemingly "came out of nowhere," to the uninformed, or unaware.
It seems to me when information seemingly comes out of "nowhere", it's certainly worthy of a look, and one should look, research and question until they have satisfied themselves, one way or the other.
Anyone not willing to dig, explore, question and look for answers about information that seemingly "comes out of nowhere," or even seems outrageous, has chosen to be fixed in their ideas (perhaps because it gives them comfort, who knows), simply they are not open to learning.
Food for thought.
I love it.
I don’t put my full faith into every thing Q says. I don’t think Q would want us to anyhow. I also think it is important to research as many other topics as we can.
I think it is great that people are looking into the US CORPORATION angle. However, whether there is any merit to it is yet to be seen. I first ran across the concept of that and Admirality Law months ago and looked into it for a while but there was so much disagreement that I moved on.
After DJT’s election was stolen (coup) and after the artificial goalposts were pushed back a few times, I observed its reemergence in big way. People were desperate to find another theory that suited them that would get Trump back on their timeline. I actually think it would be hilarious if the Corp thing was all true. Coming from years in the legal system, I don’t see it working if it was true. Judges, attorneys, and cops are so resistant to change and the legal system is a whole other swamp to drain.
It’s the SAME swamp. Follow the money. What part of ‘the US is a corporation that prints unlimited amounts of its own money’ would you consider not worth prioritizing?
lol that's the definition of schizophrenia. Looks to symbols and hints in things that arent meant to be messages lmfao. You all are absolutely bat shit crazy
Nice hand shake shill.
When you can’t attack the message, you attack the messenger.
First, you demonstrated ignorance by defining a psychological disease without bothering to look it up.
Second, you literally attack something that was not mentioned in my post e.g. symbols.
Finally, you attempt to diminish the value of the message by attacking the messenger AND turning said messenger to into some amorphous, previously undefined group e.g. “You all are bay shit crazy.”
Why don’t you try thinking for a change. Ask some questions look for answers. Try it, you might find it serves you.
Attacking the thoughtful people on this board serves no purpose. Your baseless rants don’t challenge their well researched, well thought out understandings.
If you have something of value to add, add it. Otherwise, you’re a waste of space.
Take a look at the discussions here
https://greatawakening.win/p/11SJoYh27p/dan-scavino-posted-this-on-his-s/c/
There may be more to it than you think, then again it could just be a pipe dream.
Take a look at the references from this page: https://www.educatedinlaw.org/2019/02/united-states-is-a-federal-corporation-says-u-s-code-title-28/
Came out of nowhere? It started with the Organic Act of 1801, then the Banking Act of 1871 and finally with the Reserve Act of 1913 that created the Federal Reserve.
So something that took 112 years to come to fruition did not "come literally out of nowhere".
I would not say it came out if nowhere but I would say it is picking up traction because people are feeling the financial pinch. Kind of like UBI.