Why are you so invested in posters believing that was Hillary? Your 2nd comment insisting it was her, which it isn't possible to know with certainty from either point of view? It doesn't make a bit of difference whether it was a body double or not, but you seem very concerned about what others on this thread think. What's up with that?
did you not see the title to the post?
OP is telling us that IS a body double,
and that's why we end up on the Jimmy Kimmel show.
I've also watched hundreds of HRC videos, and observed her mannerisms for decades, and I believe that was not her dumpy body double at the inauguration. You also have that freedom, to believe what you want...
why would I look at twitter when we're talking about HRC at the inauguration? I watched the video live on ABC of her and Bill entering the building/walking around. AND I, ME, a person with the ability to reason, think that was HRC in the hideous purple pantsuit with her blow dryed hair. You can also think what you want?
Because she has the pictures from the inaug on there and you can zoom in on them. I will prob upload them later. That isn't her. Reason isn't visual detection. Also if you can reason, you can also reason the use of body doubles. That's such a terrible line of logic..
yeah whatever, why don't you go to the same twitter link, and click through the pictures until you see BC and HRC, years ago, at Christmas, she is a lot shorter than her husband, so OP's first premise is out the window. and my last post, can't deal with millennials and their ridiculous rants. 'prob'? seriously? ?
that was HRC at the inauguration, could see the panic in her eyes. quit spreading rumors.
Why are you so invested in posters believing that was Hillary? Your 2nd comment insisting it was her, which it isn't possible to know with certainty from either point of view? It doesn't make a bit of difference whether it was a body double or not, but you seem very concerned about what others on this thread think. What's up with that?
did you not see the title to the post? OP is telling us that IS a body double, and that's why we end up on the Jimmy Kimmel show. I've also watched hundreds of HRC videos, and observed her mannerisms for decades, and I believe that was not her dumpy body double at the inauguration. You also have that freedom, to believe what you want...
Bullshit go look at her twitter. That isn't her.
why would I look at twitter when we're talking about HRC at the inauguration? I watched the video live on ABC of her and Bill entering the building/walking around. AND I, ME, a person with the ability to reason, think that was HRC in the hideous purple pantsuit with her blow dryed hair. You can also think what you want?
Because she has the pictures from the inaug on there and you can zoom in on them. I will prob upload them later. That isn't her. Reason isn't visual detection. Also if you can reason, you can also reason the use of body doubles. That's such a terrible line of logic..
yeah whatever, why don't you go to the same twitter link, and click through the pictures until you see BC and HRC, years ago, at Christmas, she is a lot shorter than her husband, so OP's first premise is out the window. and my last post, can't deal with millennials and their ridiculous rants. 'prob'? seriously? ?