Example of parallax problem - disappearing people debunk - sorry
(media.greatawakening.win)
Comments (17)
sorted by:
THANK YOU! #angles
First off, angles are VASTLY different, and way in this case. Second, one angle is way closer and cropping out the rest, why not compare at same DISTANCE (focal length) at a different angle, its the only comparison that matters, not the apples and oranges here. Though Pence can still be seen in both no matter what, disproving your theory right there. Yes, in picture on right you can see only his hair, but he's still there, clearly. Unlike the Xiden's twats, USSS guy and a couple of others. BTW, which one was Hunter having?
Camera not capturing people in the back, or those on the right (Baron) proves absolutely nothing since it simply clips them out, completely, and deliberately. In Xiden's video it doesn't matter what angle is used, or distance, certain people should still be "there" and visible, from a different angle, of course, but still.
And what does parallax have to do with any of this? I don't think the OP understands what parallax is. An object will still APPEAR, just at a different angle and somewhat differently (size?), but it WILL STILL APPEAR. Main premise of parallax, parallax doesn't make something completely vanish.
Same focal length, otherwise no point of discussing.
Nah dawg. Not the same.
Yes the guy in the first clip could be a lot farther behind Trump and the second picture would confirm that. But this is nothing like the positioning of the 2 girls plus several others. I see how yes that happens but I think merely a spacial explanation can be ruled out.
They are pretty close together from the original video I found of the inauguration in 2016.
I haven't done a complete 100% side by side example, I'm at work - but it does show how the front view compresses the distance between the podium and the seats behind, which makes people look close when they aren't.
This does not explain the "disappearing Obama".....
Wait what. Let me see this
People don't understand focal lengths at all
Yes, 2 very different ones. Your point? Main issue with the OP "proof", apples and oranges. Want to show "proof", then provide SAME FOCAL LENGTH, at different angles.
I just watched it again, and I’m still convinced the girl in the pink and the girl in the white disappear.
They don’t disappear. There’s a PBS video and you see them from a wide angle shot. Jill and their children are the only family standing directly next to him. The girls are situated a few feet further back next to a grandson(?) who also “disappears.” It’s the angle mixed with the zoom that distorts the perspective.
https://youtu.be/z2Np_9_c05E
You are correct, the Biden inauguration cameras were all from vastly different angles.
The theory that there were two inaugurations was really just a reflection of how much everyone has come to distrusting the system.
what is this?
https://youtu.be/h4JT-IhUoTg
https://youtu.be/q5iCPKDp4V4
Angles from above bypass any parallax points. You can see that the white and pink girls are not available in some shots.
Of course they do have a built in reason for pre-recording. They were afraid of a terrorist attack. Plus Biden probably can't remember shit so he got 2 chances to swear on the bible and they spliced together the best possible arrangement.