Red Pill me. Interested in different perspectives and coming in with a completely open mind. Give it your best shot, for real.
You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.
Comments (197)
sorted by:
Red Pill me. Interested in different perspectives and coming in with a completely open mind. Give it your best shot, for real.
No one gets red-pilled by being force fed. You dig for information if you want it. Feed yourself, exercise your mind. Only you can change you.
Yes, I feel like getting redpilled is by fate (or by God). Some people get redpilled over the smallest thing, while others are given a mountain of evidence and they don't want to believe it.
And anybody that thinks this is just about being "red-pilled" at this point has a lot to learn. We don't want to eradicate an opposing political party like the dumbfucks who elected Pedo Joe, but end the horrific shit they're doing and accomplish a much broader goal than any political party could encompass by itself.
It wouldn't really be force feeding. I'll eat it willingly, I just need someone to provide some info?
This short video, "The Plan To Save The World," outlines a lot of it well:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dUH2eiYjQxM
From my position, all of the problems listen in this video are a symptom of late-stage capitalism in which finite resources are being depleted and thus the capitalist class that owns all the wealth are doing everything in their power to keep gaining more power and wealth while benefiting from the fall out & keep their profits coming. I don't think there's a deep network of people pulling this off, rather it's being done in front of us every day and it's really not that hard to find the link between all these problems and someone making a profit off of it.
This isn't a left vs. right issue, it's a ultra rich vs the rest of us issue. & party politics is only used to further drive that wedge.
What do you think Capitalism is?
Capitalism is a word for the system humans naturally use to exchange things.
Adam Smith simply outlined the way people interacted.
Watch the filmstrip fren: Learn about money and who is controlling it.
https://youtu.be/mII9NZ8MMVM
And here we go. The commie was never interested in a real conversation.
Let this be a lesson. Don't take the bait. Just block and deport lefty shills.
What made the United States pre-1800s unique was that the government existed only with the consent of the governed. There wasn't really a social elite that held power because they were rich and powerful, or because 'God wills it', or because they used the military as a tool to hold power. The people who held power in the early period of our Republic held power because they were well-educated and were generally well-respected by the people around them.
There was also a greater emphasis on the USA being a union of states with their own sovereign governments, their own laws, and their own traditions. These states individually had the right to determine the manner in which their governments were elected to office, and those members of government would then represent the interests of their constituents on the federal level.
The problem is that nowadays, Congress members care far more about representing their personal interests than the interests of their constituents. The solution would normally be to elect into office individuals who do actually give a damn about their constituents beyond their personal goals, but as you may have seen in this election cycle, the individuals holding power will defraud that power of the people in order to prevent themselves from being voted out of office.
I realize that you are an anarchist, but I would also direct you to the precedent of world history to suggest that no government is worse than a bad government. The reason for this is simple: Even a government that oppresses its people can often defend itself militarily from other governments. A good government exists for no other reason than the protection of the governed from foreign invasion and domestic destruction.
Well ... there is so much info. What is it you are interested in? Asking questions about things you questions about is a good start.
Why? Do you have to report your "findings" soon?
This is bait for another fucking hit piece of a response with one word off putting.
Dumb comment. Where is the 'by force?' This person asked for info. How about not being a dick and giving him some.
Or you could through my response to his response ... and then you would see he did exactly what I and others suggested, start asking questions. Simply handing subject matter out is useless if they aren't interested in it. And no, it is not a "dick move", it is getting engagement, which is critical.