All of his recently signed orders/"Actions" are being challenged. Dems set the precedent that virtually everything Trump did could be challenged, so now it's coming back around.
If court grants the injunction, the orders have no weight.
How does this happen?
Do judges get notified of these & have to review / vet the orders, or is this some organization that monitors EO's taking these to court to get injunctions?
A lawfag will know more/correct, but as far I understand, these cases are taken up in Federal Districts when they're challenged by State AGs or a federal judge can issue an injunction outright to challenge the constitutionality of whatever they're objecting to.
Some cases need an aggrieved party, others (especially if the judge is activistic) are plainly unconstitutional and will be acted upon by a judge themself.
If I recall, Obama era judges had a field day with Trump starting out, challenging every EO he did.
All of his recently signed orders/"Actions" are being challenged. Dems set the precedent that virtually everything Trump did could be challenged, so now it's coming back around.
If court grants the injunction, the orders have no weight.
How does this happen? Do judges get notified of these & have to review / vet the orders, or is this some organization that monitors EO's taking these to court to get injunctions?
A lawfag will know more/correct, but as far I understand, these cases are taken up in Federal Districts when they're challenged by State AGs or a federal judge can issue an injunction outright to challenge the constitutionality of whatever they're objecting to.
Some cases need an aggrieved party, others (especially if the judge is activistic) are plainly unconstitutional and will be acted upon by a judge themself.
If I recall, Obama era judges had a field day with Trump starting out, challenging every EO he did.