We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.
We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence? What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.