We have everything.
How can we use what we know?
How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence?
What are you witnessing unfold?
Trust the plan.
Q
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Schumer is the worst of the worst satanic pedophile (((communist))) demons in modern history.
The explanation is EASY:
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.
They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Frankly if I could get away with doing anything & everything I wanted maybe I would do it myself too!!
Then this brings me back to my original point. Schumer isn't stupid, so why would he go through a process that allows Trump a chance to defend himself with evidence?
This is a trial and, quite frankly, will have better ratings than the fucking Super bowl. Do you think Trump's lawyers (Giuliani and co.) will allow a one sided circus?
** The explanation is EASY:**
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Maybe he doesn’t know what evidence they have? He thinks if they had evidence they would have used it by now? Or maybe he thinks they can just bulldog it into getting the results they want by bribing/blackmailing the judges? Or they are going to create fake evidence again like they did with the Russia Hoax? I know they are already trying to say that Trump was on a call with Putin during the storming of the Capitol lmao.
I tell you what; If The Plan ends up falling thru for any reason whatsoever & we don't see real, concrete, earth-shattering, thermo-Nuclear HABBENINGS within the next 1-2 months........
Schumer? They can have deals, live out life in gitmo instead of death. The only deal they should get is one that maybe spares their life but they should never see family, kids, friends, anyone ever again and be left to suffer the mental anguish That a prison cell would offer. No rec, no outside time. Nothing.
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.
We have everything. How can we use what we know? How do you ‘legally’ inject/make public/use as evidence? What are you witnessing unfold? Trust the plan. Q
Wow, very fitting. It's Q Post #1181 on 4/19/2018 for anyone wanting to confirm it.
I don’t understand why they get a trial but we never got one for election fraud.
The application of the law when it suits them is infuriating!
Am I wrong to think that Trump shouldn’t have to set foot in a courtroom for this Kangaroo court?
Does this mean Schumer is secretly a white hat? Because he's a fucking asshole, but he isn't stupid. He HAS to know Trump's lawyers will lay out EVERYTHING for the world to see.
Abso-Fucking-lutely NOT.
Schumer is the worst of the worst satanic pedophile (((communist))) demons in modern history.
The explanation is EASY:
their arrogance, Hubris, and the fact that they have NEVER faced any consequences nor responsibility for any of their actions.
They have literally done anything and everything they want, committed every serious and disgusting crime imaginable, and NOT ONCE been held to serious account.
Frankly if I could get away with doing anything & everything I wanted maybe I would do it myself too!!
Then this brings me back to my original point. Schumer isn't stupid, so why would he go through a process that allows Trump a chance to defend himself with evidence?
This is a trial and, quite frankly, will have better ratings than the fucking Super bowl. Do you think Trump's lawyers (Giuliani and co.) will allow a one sided circus?
"These people are stupid" - Q
No offense fren, but you didn’t read my post. ;-)
I’ve been wondering the same thing.
Maybe he doesn’t know what evidence they have? He thinks if they had evidence they would have used it by now? Or maybe he thinks they can just bulldog it into getting the results they want by bribing/blackmailing the judges? Or they are going to create fake evidence again like they did with the Russia Hoax? I know they are already trying to say that Trump was on a call with Putin during the storming of the Capitol lmao.
You are literally being way too fucking kind.
Exactly. Right now they think they successfully stole another election.
Yep.
I tell you what; If The Plan ends up falling thru for any reason whatsoever & we don't see real, concrete, earth-shattering, thermo-Nuclear HABBENINGS within the next 1-2 months........
War.
What if he sings for a deal
Schumer? They can have deals, live out life in gitmo instead of death. The only deal they should get is one that maybe spares their life but they should never see family, kids, friends, anyone ever again and be left to suffer the mental anguish That a prison cell would offer. No rec, no outside time. Nothing.
Hopefully.......
Have we heard who is going to preside over the hearing? Since (corrupt) John Roberts won't be there, I'm guessing one of the Liberal judges. And all 'objections' have to go thru the Judge to the Senate body. IMO, many of the Senators will object and NOT want to hear the remarks from Trump's team. It's VERY possible that evidence will again be suppressed.
I wonder if this is may be a possible reason SCOTUS denied the case? So there wouldn’t be any obstacle in presenting the evidence? I’m not an expert (except in armchairs) but it seems like evidence being presented in an ongoing case is limiting for it to be used elsewhere? Just a thought.
Nope, they're just stupid as fuck.
Q doesn't joke when he(they) say "these people are stupid".
I don't think they legit realize the can of worms they're opening up with this impeachment.
They can play it ALL out in the Senate... it will have to be seen by all.