In other words, your position appears that while the Acts which supposedly are the basis for the theory don't say anything remotely proving or supporting the theory, in fact contradict it by clearly being limited to the local government of this small district and having nothing to do with the national government or anywhere outside the physical bounds of the small district, who needs the Acts to agree with the claims?

Nor does a single piece of law or legal decision anywhere back it up (or, provide one if you have one.)

But that's okay, because you had links to assertions, which don't agree with the actual Acts.

There has to be a foundation for claims. And when the claimed foundation not only doesn't say as claimed but contradicts, some will spot the problem while others will hold to their theory regardless.

Anyway, each can read for himself the Acts and see for themselves.

If you think you're going to awaken anyone by arguing Biden was elected President of a US Corporation only, which corporation Trump dissolved by himself, based on Acts you name which don't match up with claims, and therefore Biden is President of nothing and Trump is the 19th President and that is what will soon be revealed, good luck with that. IMO this theory exists as disinfo to appeal to Patriots as the narrative seems great, but as a weapon for them to lose their credibility when touting the literally baseless theory.

I posted the alleged foundations: any can see for themselves the not only zero support but absolute contradiction. I understand you appear to be not processing that so whatever reply you like, have the last word. I know it won't be actual evidence because it never is with this theory.

And no, a law setting out the various ways in which the United States can be a party to a case by defining that this can include whether as a "A) Federal corporation; (B)an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the United States; or (C)an instrumentality of the United States" does not say any more than that. The government comprises not only agencies, departments, etc but also entities which eaxh are a Federal corporation such as for example the Tennessee Valley Authority. Completely different than confirming the government was replaced. Added because I think you may have been sincere with that, but no, it does not support the theory, at all.