The Federal Reserve Banking Act of 1913 under President Wilson was viewed as a way to allow professionals to control the printing of money, to avoid runaway inflation. The world was on the verge of WW I and Germany was on the verge of bankruptcy from inflationary practices. The Great Depression then created an erratic Stock Market so the 1933 Act under President Roosevelt gave more power to the Federal Reserve. Roosevelt was a Jew and had great respect for Jewish bankers. Once given the power to print US dollars and lend them out to US banks or the US government, the bankers in charge of the Federal Reserve found a way to enslave the US in debt slavery. Loan the USA its own dollars and demand payback with interest.
The banking industry is hugely profitable. At every step of the way they make money. First, by controlling the Federal Reserve, they get to create money by running the virtual printing presses. This is a pen stroke, or a toggle switch, for the bankers. Then the Federal Reserve loans this money out to banks, and these loans must be repaid with interest. These banks are allowed to create loans to consumers at 5X the original loan from the Federal Reserve, once again money from thin air. All these loans are then repaid with interest by consumers. The Federal Reserve is allowed to print money from thin air, the banks expand this, and get it returned with interest.
Why was it necessary to have 65,000 National Guard troops in DC on January 20, Inauguration Day? This was an invasion of DC by troops loyal to President Trump, reporting to President Trump directly. Consider the nexus between the foreign control of the 2020 election process, and the foreign ownership of the National Debt, and President Trump's EOs wherein he allows seizure of assets if foreign interference with the election process is discovered. This means DC, and specifically the Treasury, has changed hands.
President Trump and the true Republic of the US now owns the Treasury, which resides in DC, so there is no more National Debt owed to foreign entities. This is a huge loss of assets for the Cabal. This is not the NESARA claim. The funds given to banks to manage will be federal funds, not Federal Reserve funds, and thus the interest rate can be dropped to banks, and their interest rate also reduced to actual expenses. No more rich bankers. Since these are federal funds, any education loans can be interest free. The Khazarians will be stripped of their income.
But they're not even really Jewish. They are Khazarians disguised as Jews. The Rothschilds in reality are Khazarian, and it was they that purchased Israel from the British before WW2. Despite what people might think the rulers of modern day Israel aren't the Israelites of the bible.
Most the of the 'bad rep' that Jews have are a direct result of the Kazharian infiltration/takeover and their actions.
The holocaust was in part about the Molchite Kazahrian 'Jews' exterminating the non infiltrated Jewish sects and using it as a tool/reason to create Israel.
The thing about the Kazahrian religion is that their tenet's are basically 'thou shall back-stab, thou shall lie, thou shall hide, thou shall manipulate, thou shall use others, others shal die to serve your purposes' etc etc.
With that kind of mindset in a religion that is as old as Christianity(that has managed to survive and thrive for several millennia without that subterfuge) things aren't as obvious and simple as you try to make them out to be.
Do you really think these people haven't gotten their hands on the Christian bible or any/all other religious texts and 'edited' it to serve their purposes......
I mean in the original text's the number is 616 and not 666(their number) and the original number isn't the 'number of (their) beast' but one that they actually feared enough to usurp and change into their 666.........
(many more examples but I'm not about to address the entirety of the bible and several other religious texts in a win comment...)
So behavior consistent with a religious text isn't quite as straight forward an argument as it may seem since those religious texts aren't entirely what they seem either...
You're in for a rough ride...
That is not my argument at all... But you seem beyond reason, so I don't think this will go anywhere.
You don't get what I'm saying. You're missing the point here. I'm choosing not to engage because your multiple paragraphs are rebutting arguments I never made. You went from 0 to 100 on something I never implied lol.