SCOTUS Roberts took the position of lack of standing for nearly all Election Fraud cases on their docket. Patriots take the position that SCOTUS Roberts is complicit in swearing in foreign traitors on the People's property. How will he get himself out of this one? - The Great Awakening

SCOTUS Roberts took the position of lack of standing for nearly all Election Fraud cases on their docket. Patriots take the position that SCOTUS Roberts is complicit in swearing in foreign traitors on the People's property. How will he get himself out of this one? (media.greatawakening.win)

posted 3 years ago by tumbleweed 3 years ago by tumbleweed +483 / -0

22 comments download

22 comments share download save hide report block hide replies

You're viewing a single comment thread. View all comments, or full comment thread.

Comments (22)

sorted by:

▲ 4 ▼

– SvixGale 4 points 3 years ago +4 / -0

This is correct.

This is also why I have zero faith in the supreme court to do ANYTHING AT ALL to try to right this thermonuclear crime that has been foisted upon us.

Like; SCOTUS wouldn't hear Texas' very valid case about election fraud; you think they're going to take up a "quo warranto" or whatever that thing is I've seen flying around here?

Give me a break.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 4 ▼

– Wtf_socialismreally 4 points 3 years ago +5 / -1

I have zero trust and respect in SCOTUS, or any court of law anymore.

If you think that states should be allowed to commit election fraud, especially in a way that affects other states, then you are a problem that should be sent to another country to deal with.

We really need to start ejecting the people in government that are actually fucktards like SCOTUS.

We have to reject their bullshit period.

permalink parent save report block reply

▲ 1 ▼

– SvixGale 1 point 3 years ago +1 / -0

Absolutely, well said.

Well.....now's the time to start "ejecting"...... In fact, I'd argue it's now or never.....

permalink parent save report block reply

To The Great Awakening

We are researchers who deal in open-source information, reasoned argument, and dank memes. We do battle in the sphere of ideas and ideas only. We neither need nor condone the use of force in our work here. WE ARE THE PUBLIC FACE OF Q. OUR MISSION IS TO RED-PILL NORMIES.

This is a pro-Q community. Please read and respect our rules below before contributing.

WHY Q?

"Those who cannot understand that we cannot simply start arresting w/o first: ensuring the safety & well-being of the population shifting the narrative removing those in DC through resignation to ensure success defeating ISIS/MS13 to prevent fail-safes freezing assets to remove network-to-network abilities kill off COC to prevent top-down comms/org, etc. etc. should not be participating in discussions." Q