Sorry, but that just seems beyond all sanity and humanity. You can create a variety of effective distractions, should the need arise, without mowing down dozens of innocent Americans at a concert.

It presupposes that the FBI is filled, top-to-bottom, with not just power-swollen bed-featherer “deep staters” who might have some questionable preferences in geopolitical alliances, but rather with dozens or more legitimately sadistic psychopaths with zero connection with their countrymen.

I could see this behavior possibly for one under-the-radar badged sociopath, maybe a nightmare Columbine situation of two fcked-up misfits who found each other while working in the FBI, but a whole organization, to commit something murderously depraved for... why, again? To cover up some Saudi’s assassination attempt that didn’t ever even go down? At the risk of everyone involved being sentenced to certain death if this mass murder cover-up scheme didn’t go, um, perfectly? With the knowledge that friends and family and family friends could very well be in that crowd? There is no possible calculus where any of this makes sense. And that many weapons, for an assassination attempt on one man?

This whole horror stinks for a better explanation than the official one, but I really have a hard time with the “FBI mowed down 60 innocent Americans in cold blood to ‘distract’ from a non-event that nobody ever would have particularly noticed” theory.

What am I possibly missing here? Not every inscrutable event should suggest the most wantonly wicked conspiracy imaginable.