This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
I believe military is the only final solution to this farce, however, SCOTUS could have ruled on the constitutional aspect of states changing voting laws IMO.
I'm not overly confident that audits will provide the evidence needed because you can bet your bottom dollar that they have been working like slaves in a sweatshop to cover-up all evidence of fraud.
Even if the Supreme Court came in and fixed everything, wholesale, liberals would only say that happened because Trump pack the courts, and it would only galvanized their efforts to attack and pack the courts the next time they get power.
That's kind of what I'm hoping for. Trump now has standing so he gets to be heard - in a fair court he wins. But the Dems won't accept it, which will lead to the military stepping in and arresting them, which most people will agree was necessary.
If that's the script, it's an excellent one for destroying the Democrat party.