This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
I believe military is the only final solution to this farce, however, SCOTUS could have ruled on the constitutional aspect of states changing voting laws IMO.
I'm not overly confident that audits will provide the evidence needed because you can bet your bottom dollar that they have been working like slaves in a sweatshop to cover-up all evidence of fraud.
Yeah. Fingers crossed they're part of the plan.
Even if the Supreme Court came in and fixed everything, wholesale, liberals would only say that happened because Trump pack the courts, and it would only galvanized their efforts to attack and pack the courts the next time they get power.
Oh... So they're gonna do it anyway? That's like complying with digging your own grave.
That's kind of what I'm hoping for. Trump now has standing so he gets to be heard - in a fair court he wins. But the Dems won't accept it, which will lead to the military stepping in and arresting them, which most people will agree was necessary.
If that's the script, it's an excellent one for destroying the Democrat party.
The military does not swear an oath to the CiC. If military has the proof the CiC is illegitimate, they are not going to consider him a commander.
The military is sworn to defend the Constitution from enemies foreign and domestic. If concrete evidence exists that this election was worked in concert with foreign powers (which we know it does because of sworn affidavits in Italian court) then domestic actors (most in the battleground states) are considered traitors and that puts it completely in the purview of the military.
In the case of treason or foreign powers bear in mind that different evidence - gathered through military intelligence - may be used in tribunals but is usually not permissible in civil courts since it is gathered in a manner different than civil courts.
So, for example, if MILINT did in fact monitor the packets transferring back and forth between countries on the elections, they can use that in a tribunal but could not in civil court because of the method of intelligence gathering.
As Q had said many times, how do you introduce evidence. I believe this is one of the methods Q was referring to.
But its not, lady in texas got caught and is being criminally charged for ballot harvesting. Now that being said if they left a money trail and paid a bunch of people and Texas finds it thats going to open up another can of worms. I still can't believe the bitch was dumb enough to do it in Texas of all places TX doesn't fuck around im sure there are other cases that are getting pushed aside just like that in those other states.
Hence the "He's not actually president and the inauguration and everything is a movie" idea. Which obviously sounds farfetched but think about every crazy thing that's happened before it.
On the face of it that is true. However, we don't know for certain what intelligence the military has regarding election interference and whether the EO from 2018 will be in effect.
First and foremost the military swears to defend the people and uphold the constitution.
With concrete evidence, that could result in arresting anyone complicit in a coup, including top brass if necessary.
Without the military, there is no other option, we've seen that. If they also control the military, then I fear any resistance will be futile.
I beg to differ...the fraud expert autists have already proven there's massive fraud and they presented it to multiple states - Arizona is one of those and this caused subpoenas to be issued to confiscate all of the voting machines and to perform forensic audits on them. This battle is still ongoing by the way.
The goalposts have been moved so many times what are we even shooting for at this point? First no fraud, then no widespread fraud, then not enough fraud to overturn election. It just keeps happening.
I think we are all just discussing it and trying to figure it out.
Yeah probably so but you have to look at that, they are probably burning all the ballots and clearing all the devices even still to cover their asses. The only problem with that is that they have now burned all of the illegal ballots. They need to do a second round of recounts and id bet my bottom dollar there would be over 100,000 that went "missing" in the past month in everyone of those swing states.