This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
I believe military is the only final solution to this farce, however, SCOTUS could have ruled on the constitutional aspect of states changing voting laws IMO.
I'm not overly confident that audits will provide the evidence needed because you can bet your bottom dollar that they have been working like slaves in a sweatshop to cover-up all evidence of fraud.