This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
Not flimsy at all. The DoD could have approached the court and told them for national security reasons they need to deny a hearing based on standing. From my understanding military courts do not allow for appeals and that would help speed up the process so that we as a country can move on and not be dragged through long and lengthy court battles. And I would imagine the military would deliver harsher penalties, including the death penalty with more ease than a none military court. You also have the issue of sensitive information that could be beneficial to our enemies coming out in a hearing and our military would definitely like to have control over the decimation of that information.