This may be a flimsy theory but I was just thinking, what if "standing" is just a red herring?
Is it possible that due to the influence of a foreign power in this case, the issue isn't that the plaintiffs in the case lack standing, but that the courts themselves lack jurisdiction?
Q always said the military was the only way--is it possible that military courts are the only way too when election fraud involves foreign actors?
I beg to differ...the fraud expert autists have already proven there's massive fraud and they presented it to multiple states - Arizona is one of those and this caused subpoenas to be issued to confiscate all of the voting machines and to perform forensic audits on them. This battle is still ongoing by the way.