It's called a discussion, someone presents an hypothesis and then it is challenged, the end result should be the truth.
Unless you're suggesting we should all turn off our brains and accept everything at face value? is that how Q operated? did they go like "Hey guys!! here's a fact for you! accept it! don't question it!!"? or did they always presented a bunch of questions to foster reflection and CRITICAL thinking?
It's called a discussion, someone presents an hypothesis and then it is challenged, the end result should be the truth.
Unless you're suggesting we should all turn off our brains and accept everything at face value? is that how Q operated? did they go like "Hey guys!! here's a fact for you! accept it! don't question it!!"? or did they always presented a bunch of questions to foster reflection and CRITICAL thinking?
I'm sorry but calling it a "discussion" is a stretch. Stop overreaching you look ridiculous.
Hah, ok buddy *pats head*
I'm the one overreacting