Say, for example, you were a high level politician who along the way had been corrupted by the deep state and had been doing their bidding for the last several years. If Q team presented evidence to you that implicated you in horrible things, then asked for your help... what would you do?
You now have a choice. You can continue to work for the deep state knowing you'll most likely eventually be caught and put in prison or put to death. If you choose this option, you'll forever go down as a traitor and all the evidence against you will be made public. Also, your family may be also charged as complicit in your crimes. It will be a dark shadow on all your future descendants.
OR... you can ACT like you're continuing to work for the deep state, but actually will now work for the white hats. This won't spare you prison or a potential death sentence. But, like McCain, your legacy will be spared and your family will be spared.
What would you do?
And just how does that sit with the Q goal of transparency? Something about that aspect doesn't add up, I think there will be evidence enough for those who want to know, but it just might not be publicised is all.
'During' - no.
It feels like there must come a time when the net effect of no visible action will have a detrimental effect on those who are already red-pilled vs red-pilling of the obstinate.
Probably just me being selfish, but I'd be lying if I said it wasn't starting to get to me.