We have the downvote for a reason. If a zero score post falls to the bottom of the barrel in minutes where all the replies are "proof or gtfo," which is exactly what happens, how is that harmful?
I'm not saying there should be no banning of people based on if they are just trying to stir up shit. They can always come back with a clean slate and post higher quality content. But deleting what they say is not the way to go.
I know nothing about it, I'll take your word for it. Maybe there were several because someone had something they felt was important to say and they kept getting deleted...
We have the downvote for a reason. If a zero score post falls to the bottom of the barrel in minutes where all the replies are "proof or gtfo," which is exactly what happens, how is that harmful?
I'm not saying there should be no banning of people based on if they are just trying to stir up shit. They can always come back with a clean slate and post higher quality content. But deleting what they say is not the way to go.
What flood? What people? Doing a search for "pizzagate" gives me a total of 9 posts over 5 months; most of them pretty well rated.
Are you suggesting that talking about Pizzagate AT ALL is somehow a bad thing?
I know nothing about it, I'll take your word for it. Maybe there were several because someone had something they felt was important to say and they kept getting deleted...