The problem isn’t the corporations. Remember Occupy Wallstreet? They ‘almost’ had it right but not quite. The problem isn’t Wallstreet but the liaison between the government and Wallstreet (corporations) that creates a disadvantage for the consumer. In a true free market, the success or failure of a company depends on it’s ability to meet supply/demand. When legislation interferes with true supply/demand, we have a warped “capitalist” (which really isn’t) environment. All we need to do is take government back to a limited role to simply protect the consumer/individual and let the free market thrive.
Yes. Corporations aren’t inherently bad.
But a government that allows them to violate laws and artificially suppresses competition is the cause of 99% of problems.
Yup, if I remember right without reading my comment again, I don't think I mentioned any of the owners or ceos of those companies. I don't care if those people are removed, put in prison or whatever but the companies have decades of infrastructure that is extremely useful.
I don't like the idea of someone's company being taken from them but at least 1 of them is highly suspected to have been given to its ceo through the cia but regardless, when they went as far as to censor and ban a sitting president, well isn't that almost kinda like treason?
If I expand my thinking,
which I try to do always,
The corporations are really a single animal, operating in different sectors.
At the top of the corporate tree are the Bond Holders, who are the actual proprietors, owners.
Collectively all corporations are owned by a relatively small number of entities and people.
Basically, the Bond holders are the Khazars, those ancient bloodlines who rule over us.
So if they lose the battle for the world, as we all suspect they will,
then these corporations will be seized as forfeiture for their crimes against humanity.
The liquidators of the USA Inc will also have supervision of those assets
then people like Bezos have a change of status.
A lot of what these corporations do or provide may still be needed, eg phones, internet, vehicles, food, etc etc.
There is a need to maintain their operations and production etc
but a new ownership structure with a new public benefit charter will be needed.
The problem isn’t the corporations. Remember Occupy Wallstreet? They ‘almost’ had it right but not quite. The problem isn’t Wallstreet but the liaison between the government and Wallstreet (corporations) that creates a disadvantage for the consumer. In a true free market, the success or failure of a company depends on it’s ability to meet supply/demand. When legislation interferes with true supply/demand, we have a warped “capitalist” (which really isn’t) environment. All we need to do is take government back to a limited role to simply protect the consumer/individual and let the free market thrive.
Yes. Corporations aren’t inherently bad. But a government that allows them to violate laws and artificially suppresses competition is the cause of 99% of problems.
Absofrackinglutely!
Yup, if I remember right without reading my comment again, I don't think I mentioned any of the owners or ceos of those companies. I don't care if those people are removed, put in prison or whatever but the companies have decades of infrastructure that is extremely useful.
I don't like the idea of someone's company being taken from them but at least 1 of them is highly suspected to have been given to its ceo through the cia but regardless, when they went as far as to censor and ban a sitting president, well isn't that almost kinda like treason?