As an outside observer, I would be careful with lines of logic like this. While on the surface it may make sense, when viewed as if/then statements, they create paradoxical logic failures.
"If Biden does not have access to Air Force One, then he is not President."
"If Biden is shown accessing Air Force One, then it is a fake production and he is not President."
You need to find evidence that the event is fake. Not merely state it is because it disproves the first if/then statement.
Any other thought format creates a confirmation bias, and an inescapable logical fallacy.
Currently, the belief is that Biden did not have access to Air Force One. Recently he used it. They showed him using it because all Presidents are shown leaving and arriving on Air Force One. It is the common action when the President departs.
Disprove it was actually Air Force One, do not get trapped in the idea that presentation of proof is proof of the lie.
Even video proof doesn't matter anymore show them a video of somebody stealing the election in the FBI I'll tell you that you can't really say what's in the video because it ended too early or started too late
Afaik there is a new AF1 in production but not in service but the difference between those two planes is obvious and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that some idiots with more money than sense paid to have a domestic plane wrapped as af1 because the sheep are all idiots and won’t know the difference and their presstitute media won’t ask any questions. I’d be interested to hear a plane fag opinion on the differences between the two types of plane because the bottom one is way smaller than AF1 and I don’t think the new one is finished yet
As an outside observer, I would be careful with lines of logic like this. While on the surface it may make sense, when viewed as if/then statements, they create paradoxical logic failures.
"If Biden does not have access to Air Force One, then he is not President."
"If Biden is shown accessing Air Force One, then it is a fake production and he is not President."
You need to find evidence that the event is fake. Not merely state it is because it disproves the first if/then statement.
Any other thought format creates a confirmation bias, and an inescapable logical fallacy.
Currently, the belief is that Biden did not have access to Air Force One. Recently he used it. They showed him using it because all Presidents are shown leaving and arriving on Air Force One. It is the common action when the President departs.
Disprove it was actually Air Force One, do not get trapped in the idea that presentation of proof is proof of the lie.
Even video proof doesn't matter anymore show them a video of somebody stealing the election in the FBI I'll tell you that you can't really say what's in the video because it ended too early or started too late
Afaik there is a new AF1 in production but not in service but the difference between those two planes is obvious and it’s not out of the realm of possibility that some idiots with more money than sense paid to have a domestic plane wrapped as af1 because the sheep are all idiots and won’t know the difference and their presstitute media won’t ask any questions. I’d be interested to hear a plane fag opinion on the differences between the two types of plane because the bottom one is way smaller than AF1 and I don’t think the new one is finished yet
Again, it's not the type of aircraft that matters. It's the call sign. That wasn't AF1.
No use of AF1 call sign. End of story. Trackable.
Well what is the picture about. The planes look different to me.
The 747 (top) is too big to land at Delaware, so the 757 (bottom) usually used by VPotUS as AF2 can be used by PotUS as AF1.
(Also bear in mind the comments about its Air Traffic Control call sign)