4
special1ntere5t 4 points ago +4 / -0

Ok folks I just looked the red prince up and according to wiki (I know not the most reliable) the “red prince” died years ago in December 2018?? https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talal_bin_Abdulaziz

So have they written up the wrong prince tala? Is it the dopey prince who’s dead? Is this comms? What is going on??

2
special1ntere5t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Yep that’s the “Dopey Prince”… it he was one of the ones arrested by MBS and held in “jail” in a 6 star hotel and iirc when they were all arrested when MBS cleaned house they were all divested of their wealth by MBS?

1
special1ntere5t 1 point ago +1 / -0

Wonder if this is why the Swedish royals had a state visit last week? Maybe they were trying to gin up support or getting instructions/face to face comms? Crown princess Victoria did not look happy on the pic

1
special1ntere5t 1 point ago +1 / -0

Interesting line that “Trump is effectively also an incumbent”… an admission??? enter text

1
special1ntere5t 1 point ago +1 / -0

That’s what I was thinking plus the unnamed CO talking about him returning from an operational furnace and then volunteering to go straight back? Makes me wonder what and when and where this furnace was?? Strange choice of words for being in the shit really?

1
special1ntere5t 1 point ago +1 / -0

She is very good. Well researched and put together. She puts a lot of content out very quickly which makes me wonder is she adjacent to WHs because it seems like a lot of work for one person. I’ve long thought that Markle was an agent of influence of aimed at the royal family it just remains to be seen how.

She has a lot of shady connections like Ron Burkle, https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2086599/Soho-House-private-members-club-chain-bought-250m-Clintons-friend-Ron-Burkle.html the bronfmans, John Fitzpatrick and has been in the orbit of the Clinton’s for years. https://images.app.goo.gl/uSsfJQwQjND4KN6ZA

I wonder if the Sussex royal foundation that she tried to launch after walking away from the BRF was a move to try to replace the Clinton foundation which was punctured by the ongoing IRS Tax court case brought by Moynihan & Doyle? https://youtu.be/pbZSuN7vTXw

The Queen submitted to GEOTUS as evidenced by her allowing him to go first on the state visit etc . https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/14/us/trump-walks-front-queen-elizabeth.html

I don’t think she wanted Charles to take the throne - I believe she was behind the media stories (via the Times that has long standing as the media of choice for royal household leaks and stories)https://www.thetimes.co.uk/article/charles-accepted-1m-cash-in-suitcase-from-sheikh-j2pgnfsgx about his financial dodgy dealings https://www.bbc.com/news/uk-england-london-63690651

in a move to try to press him to abdicate in favor of William. Following Diana’s death the Queen stepped in and pretty much took over as William’s mentor and saw him frequently. https://www.goodto.com/royal-news/queen-prince-william-prepared-to-be-king-mentoring-595828 Given that freemasonry excludes women I don’t think the Queen was the leader I think it was the Duke of Gloucester. I wonder if she was allowed to be a meat puppet figurehead and kept in line by Diana’s death? Let’s face it, being able to take out the biggest star in the family with impunity would be a hell of a way to push your view point and to get Charles in line with an agenda. No one would believe he hadn’t ordered it (although I don’t think he did as I doubt he has the cojones). I wonder if Michael Fawcett (who charges famously said he could t do without) https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12429871/Is-Charles-former-aide-set-make-comeback-Michael-Fawcett-work-King-private-capacity-police-dropped-probe-cash-honours-claims.html was integral in the whole situation and Charles was then in the fold and secured in the cabal.

I wonder if she hung on as long as she could but he would t step aside and she couldn’t force it. It’s interesting that both the queen and William visited MI5 & MI6 after Markle https://www.insider.com/prince-william-spent-3-weeks-working-in-secret-at-mi5-and-mi6-2019-4 https://www.townandcountrymag.com/society/tradition/a31094138/queen-elizabeth-mi5-secret-visit-speech-video/

Given what Grifty has turned up I am wondering if Charles is using Markle and his idiot son to push the globalist censorship agenda from another angle and also to obliquely attack William? It’s very weird that he’s. It making any move to protect his son and heir at all. There seems to have been a shift in power following the Queens death - although Chuck got the throne I think William has the money - maybe the capitulation of the Queen handed over the finances to GEOTUS? Charles seems to spend most of his time in Scotland since his accession (exile?). William seemed to be in charge of the coronation etc as media coverage seemed to indicate he was being deferred to for arrangements? IIRC The duchy of Cornwall that funds the prince of wales is bigger https://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2022/sep/09/duchy-of-cornwall-estate-worth-1bn-passes-to-prince-william

than the duchy of Lancaster https://www.prestigeonline.com/th/people/king-charles-iii-net-worth/

And if the late queen handed that over to GEOTUS then Chuck may have gotten an empty title and had to tolerate his son wearing the pants financially?

3
special1ntere5t 3 points ago +3 / -0

Is allen west still a thing? He was based back in the day but seems to have disappeared off the radar?

10
special1ntere5t 10 points ago +10 / -0

Also someone based who has a medical background who can possibly user that to start to unpick all the medical industrial complex shenanigans and criminality

3
special1ntere5t 3 points ago +3 / -0

I think all LAs should be comprehensively audited including the close relatives and associates of those in leadership positions or with financial control authority. I recall during the Icelandic banking crash it came out that lots of LAs were sitting on millions in funds invested overseas instead of being spent on services, they are financially pillaging their constituents to feather their own nests with zero accountability

5
special1ntere5t 5 points ago +5 / -0

Yep the pigs are grabbing as much from the trough as they can before they are booted. Strange it is usually lefty councils/s

1
special1ntere5t 1 point ago +1 / -0

Absolutely agree - will raise a cup of tea to that (don’t drink)

2
special1ntere5t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Thx I didn’t see the other one - just noticed that on a break in work and posted it up 👍🏻

4
special1ntere5t 4 points ago +4 / -0

Sisters of Mercy had a track called adrenachome that was released circa 1982 https://youtu.be/vIljE2K3h40?si=SGVeZWAeCvn5VjFZ

Adrenochrome is also mentioned in The Doors of Perception by Aldous Huxley as "a product of the decomposition of adrenaline" that can "produce many of the symptoms observed in mescaline intoxication."" it was published around 1954

4
special1ntere5t 4 points ago +4 / -0

Found this article in MSM which may be comms to say that they are still open for business as it emphasizes that there are many families and clans and that Italians view it as simply a part of life they have to deal with 🤷🏻‍♀️ https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-12800541/Inside-horrific-world-Calabrian-Mafia-widow-fed-pigs-man-dead-dolphins-dumped-property-didnt-pay-protection-shocking-stories-Italys-biggest-gangster-trial-30-years.html

2
special1ntere5t 2 points ago +2 / -0

Iirc at the time we also went down a lot of rabbit holes about ms13 being the foot soldiers for the cabal but this find by 40Head makes a lot of sense and they were probably right in the middle of the whole shebang

view more: Next ›