1
SkirrSicari 1 point ago +1 / -0

"EVERY SINGLE MOVE is something that destroys the fabric of our society, EVERYTHING"

I think there is a compelling analysis to be had in the breakdown of this belief.

Why is it that one group, depending on who is in power, always believes this to be true?

Why is the country ALWAYS being destroyed every 4 years.....

Yet here we are.

Rhetoric is rhetoric, until you believe it. Then it becomes something..... else.

1
SkirrSicari 1 point ago +1 / -0

This is, at best, an ignorance driven misrepresentation of what the core of the BLM "movement" is attempting to change. It uses out dated metrics, fails to discuss the actual target populatoons involved, and...smells, of race baiting.

If the point was to remind everyone that a lot of senseless violence and property damage arose in the wake of the BLM "movement". Mission accomplished.

If the point was to provide counter evidence to the believed necessity of the "movement" by its memebers..... I'm afraid this dies not pass the bar.

1
SkirrSicari 1 point ago +1 / -0

Yah, I don't know :( . I'm old enough to have been in high school when Columbine happened.

I feel like in the 20 years since then, it's just been a blue of these kinds of events. I'm never one to look for blame,. It's not my nature, and I don't find it productive. What I do look for is the root cause... and it seems to me, there is not an appetite to explore that. Which, depresses me.

I wonder if it's because the problem is too expensive, either in dollars, or votes.

In my experience ... those are linked regardless.

3
SkirrSicari 3 points ago +3 / -0

Not to mention El Paso. That's was 2019 I think?

1
SkirrSicari 1 point ago +2 / -1

And called it.

57 - 43.

Predictable is predictable is prediction.

0
SkirrSicari 0 points ago +1 / -1

Sorry - but this is not going to happen.

No matter what exterior forces we may believe are at play here, these guys are still Partisan hacks at their core. They don't give two shits about their word. They don't give two shits about the truth. They don't give two shits about you, or your family. They DAMN sure don't give two shits about their oaths to serve the country.

For them, it's about being right, and their opponents being wrong. Its about sound bites and electability indexes.

And it's about money.

Final vote? 57 - 43.

1
SkirrSicari 1 point ago +3 / -2

Fair point. Corporations certainly have their machinations.

I also try to remember that not knowing something for certain, does not create knowledge of its opposite. That is how duplicity begins.

You may suspect an event, or create alternative scenarios based off of interlacing information, yet; lack of evidence is not evidence of any kind.

Everything requires proof. We cannot simply believe something because the opposite narrative fits our overall mental desire and design.

-2
SkirrSicari -2 points ago +2 / -4

Not to mention, he dosent step down till late Q3 of 2021.

Dude is still CEO right now. Tomorrow. Yesterday.... for the next 6 months.... its a planned transition.

0
SkirrSicari 0 points ago +3 / -3

Yah, not to mention, a quick Google search shows "Collective Souls" first concert was in mid-April of 2016... a full 4 weeks after the date of this "email".

https://www.jambase.com/band/collective-soul/tour-history/2016

Why does he call him Soros in one line, and George in another. Now by nature I am a MASSIVE skeptic on everything..... but this one just smells as bad as it looks.

Again, handshake... so what do I know.

14
SkirrSicari 14 points ago +21 / -7

As an outside observer, I would be careful with lines of logic like this. While on the surface it may make sense, when viewed as if/then statements, they create paradoxical logic failures.

"If Biden does not have access to Air Force One, then he is not President."

"If Biden is shown accessing Air Force One, then it is a fake production and he is not President."

You need to find evidence that the event is fake. Not merely state it is because it disproves the first if/then statement.

Any other thought format creates a confirmation bias, and an inescapable logical fallacy.

Currently, the belief is that Biden did not have access to Air Force One. Recently he used it. They showed him using it because all Presidents are shown leaving and arriving on Air Force One. It is the common action when the President departs.

Disprove it was actually Air Force One, do not get trapped in the idea that presentation of proof is proof of the lie.

by Evspra
0
SkirrSicari 0 points ago +1 / -1

Raisin Nut Bran.

Gotta have my almonds!

4
SkirrSicari 4 points ago +5 / -1

If I could like this 100 times I would.

You want to see the actual point of the modern political operative? You want to see the coal that causes party outrage and bias to burn so hot? Do you really want to get to the root damn cause of the media decline and corruption?

Money.

From the moment a Representative takes office, they immediately have to begin fundraising in order to have a chance at reelection. We have a system of dollars first, ideas second.

I could go on...and on. However, as a "handshake". I'll mind my manners.

-1
SkirrSicari -1 points ago +1 / -2

What are the odds?

It's almost like someone had been reading the forums for awhile.... lurking, if you will, saw this halirty ensue and decided it they had lurked enough and felt like joining in.

It's ALMOST like everyone has to start somewhere.

Its ALMOST like everyone has a first day.

-1
SkirrSicari -1 points ago +6 / -7

Wait, Obama tried to ban this book 3 times... all since 2019...when it was published?!?!

Amazing I say!!!

Simply. Amazing.

O.o.....