For sure it wasn't 1000 posts submitted by the hacker. The reasons to reject the hypothesis are very simple:
Q has many tripcodes (team up to 10, most of them are from millitary)
having that many tripcodes it's impossible that someone would allow to publish fake posts without the warning faster than 1000 next posts
time difference between 131 and the last post the hypothesis is referring to is 9 months
It's unbelievable that 10 people (more than half from military) having multiple independent tripcodes were unable to post a warning or update/delete more than 1000 fake posts for 9 months.
I'm sure they would notice/correct, the same as they've published "typo, on the move" multiple times, almost immediately after the mistake.
All of what you say is true. My first thought is it can't be right, unless Q team knew they had a mole and let them go off for disinformation it would have to be intentional.
However, if not right what do people think Q meant by 131 is the last? Any working theories on that I might have missed the last 3 years?
For the life of me I don't see the explanation for that part of the 1835 post during the trip change and I saw it in real time on voat at the time. I didn't remember thinking anything funny at the time with the 131 mention. Seeing it again last night in this context was thought provoking for the anons theory at any rate.
It meant that post 131 in the OTHER BOARD was the last. It's not rocket science. This was in the 8chan days when Q was given two boards to post on. He had his own private board where he posted a few hundred times. If you look at any Q sites that archive posts such as qagg, you can see direct links for each post. Q post 1834 shows direct link 131. Q post 1835 is the one you're referencing, and it has direct link 132. Because it's the 132nd post Q made in the OTHER board. Mystery solved. Now stop clogging up the board with this waste of time.
I mean... you literally suggested that people here comb through over 1500 posts to try and find out what's true and what's not true. I consider that a massive waste of time.
No I didn't. I said if people thought it had merit maybe we could go dig again.
1 all posts are worth re-looking at because future proves past so it's never a waste of time.
2 I didn't think it all too likely a theory as my last line states "is the anon just wrong?" I was questioning it and wondered what others thought.
But I didn't understand the board chan changes another anon told me about when I reposted with a better title. I was stuck on what Q said about post 131 being the last. As I am a bit chan illiterate I didn't realize q was posting to multi boards at the same time back at post 131.
That's possible. But then why did Q say 131 was the last? What did that mean?
The answer is simple: it was something else :)
For sure it wasn't 1000 posts submitted by the hacker. The reasons to reject the hypothesis are very simple:
Q has many tripcodes (team up to 10, most of them are from millitary)
having that many tripcodes it's impossible that someone would allow to publish fake posts without the warning faster than 1000 next posts
time difference between 131 and the last post the hypothesis is referring to is 9 months
It's unbelievable that 10 people (more than half from military) having multiple independent tripcodes were unable to post a warning or update/delete more than 1000 fake posts for 9 months.
I'm sure they would notice/correct, the same as they've published "typo, on the move" multiple times, almost immediately after the mistake.
All of what you say is true. My first thought is it can't be right, unless Q team knew they had a mole and let them go off for disinformation it would have to be intentional.
However, if not right what do people think Q meant by 131 is the last? Any working theories on that I might have missed the last 3 years?
For the life of me I don't see the explanation for that part of the 1835 post during the trip change and I saw it in real time on voat at the time. I didn't remember thinking anything funny at the time with the 131 mention. Seeing it again last night in this context was thought provoking for the anons theory at any rate.
It meant that post 131 in the OTHER BOARD was the last. It's not rocket science. This was in the 8chan days when Q was given two boards to post on. He had his own private board where he posted a few hundred times. If you look at any Q sites that archive posts such as qagg, you can see direct links for each post. Q post 1834 shows direct link 131. Q post 1835 is the one you're referencing, and it has direct link 132. Because it's the 132nd post Q made in the OTHER board. Mystery solved. Now stop clogging up the board with this waste of time.
I hardly think it's a waste of time. If I missed it, and I've followed since 2017 then others missed that connection. What you say made sense.
I mean... you literally suggested that people here comb through over 1500 posts to try and find out what's true and what's not true. I consider that a massive waste of time.
No I didn't. I said if people thought it had merit maybe we could go dig again.
1 all posts are worth re-looking at because future proves past so it's never a waste of time.
2 I didn't think it all too likely a theory as my last line states "is the anon just wrong?" I was questioning it and wondered what others thought.
But I didn't understand the board chan changes another anon told me about when I reposted with a better title. I was stuck on what Q said about post 131 being the last. As I am a bit chan illiterate I didn't realize q was posting to multi boards at the same time back at post 131.