The Romans, without telescopes, wouldn't have known of them.
The ancient civilizations of Earth knew much that, according to modern science and history, they should not have. The Sumerians depicted a shockingly accurate recount of the birth of our solar system in their stories about their gods, with specific details such as the war or collision of Saturn with another planet, and subsequently the creation of the rings of Saturn we see today.
Anyone who is interested in ancient and hidden history should read The Earth Chronicles by Zechariah Sitchin, starting with The Twelfth Planet. There is so much that has been hidden and obscured from us.
Watch out though more to sitchin than meets the eye, some satan worshiping in there covertly and nibiru isn't a thing. I'm a big Annunaki alien guy as well, love this stuff. Highly recommend following Kabamur and researching the pyramids and Atlantis/lemuria
Nibiru is crap, ancient civilizations knew of the heavens only what their eyeballs could see, which wasn't much, and Saturn's rings are at minimum ten million years old -- at which paleodate any "human" seeing them form from a collision would have been the size of a lemur and barely any brighter.
AFAIC, anybody peddling that swill is a shillfag and a glowfag.
The Old Testament repeatedly asserted: "The throne of Yahweh is in heaven" - "from heaven did the Lord behold the Earth". The New Testament spoke of "Our Father, which art in Heaven". But the credibility of the Bible was shaken by the advent and general acceptance of Evolution. If Man evolved, then surely he could not have been created all at once by a Deity who, premeditating, had suggested "Let us make Adam in our image and after our likeness". All the ancient peoples believed in gods who had descended to Earth from the heavens and who could at
will soar heavenwards. But these tales were never given credibility, having been branded by scholars from the very beginning as myths.
The writings of the ancient Near East, which include a profusion of astronomical texts, clearly speak of a planet from which these astronauts or "gods" had come. However, when scholars, fifty and one hundred years ago, deciphered and translated the ancient lists of celestial bodies, our astronomers were not yet aware of Pluto (which was only located in 1930). How then could they be expected to accept the evidence of yet one more member of our solar system? But now that we too, like the ancients, are aware of the planets beyond Saturn, why not accept that ancient evidence for the existence of the Twelfth Planet?
As we ourselves venture into space, a fresh look and an acceptance of the ancient scriptures is more than timely. Now that astronauts have landed on the Moon, and unmanned spacecraft explore other planets, it is no longer impossible to believe that a civilization on another planet more advanced than ours was capable of landing its astronauts on the planet Earth some time in the past.
If you throw away the ancient texts of the Sumerians, and the Mesopotamians, you must also throw away large swaths of The Old Testament which also depict ancient astronomical and celestial events that should have been beyond the crest of time that our ancient ancestors could peer across. Even if you throw away the account of Nibiru, and the Nephelim (who the Bible specifically references), you are still left with the chapter of Genisis in which mankind recorded the origins of their entire race.
Remember fren, there are no coincidences. When does it become mathematically and statistically impossible? I urge you to give Sitchin's work another chance. There is far too much that our ancient ancestors knew that they should not have known as to chalk it up to a coincidence and a fabrication of the imagination.
It certainly does sell well, given twenty centuries of cooks picking and choosing which bits are kept in (and embellished as time and translations go by) and which are judged heresy and ordered destroyed.
You've certainly hit the analogous nail on the head.
I agree with you that many of our civilizations' ancient texts have been selectively pruned by modern historians, and in some cases embellished as you suggest.
What you come to realize through reading Sitchin's work is that no single ancient text or mythology is unique. They are all part of the same story, the same mythology, and the same history of our ancient past.
The gods that the Sumerians, and Mesopotamians write about are one and the same as those written about by the Egyptians, Norse, Mayans, Aztecs, Incans, and the ancient East. Sitchin lays out story, after story of the gods, their lore, relations, and wars they fought, and then shows how each culture had statistically impossible overlaps in the stories of their own gods, who were given different names in different cultures, but who had exactly the same familial structure in their pantheon, who fought the same familial wars, married and had offspring with the same gods and goddesses, etc.
These civilizations never, according to modern history, had contact with one another. You can excuse some of the correlations that occurred between the cultures of early Europe and Africa, as those regions were interconnected by land that would have made it entirely possible for stories to travel, but once you start making the leap to North and South America you have to admit that such a correlations in myths and legends are impossible given the thousands of miles of ocean water that separated these peoples from one another, and the lack of technology at the time to cross these oceans. Either our ancient ancestors carried their stories across the Atlantic and Pacific to cultures far and wide, or all the ancient peoples of Earth were witness to the same events as they occurred throughout the world.
The ancient civilizations of Earth knew much that, according to modern science and history, they should not have. The Sumerians depicted a shockingly accurate recount of the birth of our solar system in their stories about their gods, with specific details such as the war or collision of Saturn with another planet, and subsequently the creation of the rings of Saturn we see today.
Anyone who is interested in ancient and hidden history should read The Earth Chronicles by Zechariah Sitchin, starting with The Twelfth Planet. There is so much that has been hidden and obscured from us.
Wow, thanks for the recommendation, checking it out now.
Watch out though more to sitchin than meets the eye, some satan worshiping in there covertly and nibiru isn't a thing. I'm a big Annunaki alien guy as well, love this stuff. Highly recommend following Kabamur and researching the pyramids and Atlantis/lemuria
Thanks for the heads up, been looking into Lemuria some already.
Also there's a good synopsis of the Sitchin's work in Lloyd Pye's "Everything You Know Is Wrong". Just finished it. Great read.
Nibiru is crap, ancient civilizations knew of the heavens only what their eyeballs could see, which wasn't much, and Saturn's rings are at minimum ten million years old -- at which paleodate any "human" seeing them form from a collision would have been the size of a lemur and barely any brighter.
AFAIC, anybody peddling that swill is a shillfag and a glowfag.
Was the Old Testament then written by shillfags and glowfags?
In his book, Sitchin writes:
Source:
If you throw away the ancient texts of the Sumerians, and the Mesopotamians, you must also throw away large swaths of The Old Testament which also depict ancient astronomical and celestial events that should have been beyond the crest of time that our ancient ancestors could peer across. Even if you throw away the account of Nibiru, and the Nephelim (who the Bible specifically references), you are still left with the chapter of Genisis in which mankind recorded the origins of their entire race.
Remember fren, there are no coincidences. When does it become mathematically and statistically impossible? I urge you to give Sitchin's work another chance. There is far too much that our ancient ancestors knew that they should not have known as to chalk it up to a coincidence and a fabrication of the imagination.
found the ai
Any science outside God's Word is false. The Bible say plenty.
It certainly does sell well, given twenty centuries of cooks picking and choosing which bits are kept in (and embellished as time and translations go by) and which are judged heresy and ordered destroyed.
No denying that.
You've certainly hit the analogous nail on the head. I agree with you that many of our civilizations' ancient texts have been selectively pruned by modern historians, and in some cases embellished as you suggest.
What you come to realize through reading Sitchin's work is that no single ancient text or mythology is unique. They are all part of the same story, the same mythology, and the same history of our ancient past. The gods that the Sumerians, and Mesopotamians write about are one and the same as those written about by the Egyptians, Norse, Mayans, Aztecs, Incans, and the ancient East. Sitchin lays out story, after story of the gods, their lore, relations, and wars they fought, and then shows how each culture had statistically impossible overlaps in the stories of their own gods, who were given different names in different cultures, but who had exactly the same familial structure in their pantheon, who fought the same familial wars, married and had offspring with the same gods and goddesses, etc.
These civilizations never, according to modern history, had contact with one another. You can excuse some of the correlations that occurred between the cultures of early Europe and Africa, as those regions were interconnected by land that would have made it entirely possible for stories to travel, but once you start making the leap to North and South America you have to admit that such a correlations in myths and legends are impossible given the thousands of miles of ocean water that separated these peoples from one another, and the lack of technology at the time to cross these oceans. Either our ancient ancestors carried their stories across the Atlantic and Pacific to cultures far and wide, or all the ancient peoples of Earth were witness to the same events as they occurred throughout the world.
No sauce on that noodle? Seems worthy of back-up.