We should just keep in mind that anyone making content at this point has access to all the same info we have and can make things that look related to Q.
Be careful of "confirmation bias", "illusion of validity bias" or "Clustering Illusion"
These are all tendencies people can develop that advertisers and propagandists alike use against us.
Also be careful of dismissing obvious patterns or hints that you see because of being afraid of confirmation bias
For example
Trump sending a tweet containing every upper- and lowercase letter, numeral, and punctuation mark in Q's new 10-character trip code—except the letter q—exactly TEN SECONDS after Q himself had posted the code itself—is not confirmation bias.
It's a demonstration of collaboration between Trump and Q featuring no mathematical possibility of being related to random chance or coincidence. The confirmation of collusion is established beyond any reasonable doubt in this single event.
I asked last night if we had any more proof George is legit and got this golden nugget: "if you have been following long enough, you can just tell (it's real)"
Has 7 upvotes, 2 downvotes. Whats going on? Are we under attack from George shills or something? Since when do we go with gut feelings on a research board?
I’ve noticed that, too. I think people are wishful to the point of gullibility at times. I get it, I’ve been there, but I think we’d all benefit from taking a deep breath and really thinking things through before stating anything with such certainty that it can be misconstrued as factual.
I see you flipped my sentence right around. And you spent all of last night defending george with zero evidence. You are highly suspect and one of the reasons I don't trust George yet.
We should just keep in mind that anyone making content at this point has access to all the same info we have and can make things that look related to Q. Be careful of "confirmation bias", "illusion of validity bias" or "Clustering Illusion" These are all tendencies people can develop that advertisers and propagandists alike use against us.
Also be careful of dismissing obvious patterns or hints that you see because of being afraid of confirmation bias
For example
Trump sending a tweet containing every upper- and lowercase letter, numeral, and punctuation mark in Q's new 10-character trip code—except the letter q—exactly TEN SECONDS after Q himself had posted the code itself—is not confirmation bias.
It's a demonstration of collaboration between Trump and Q featuring no mathematical possibility of being related to random chance or coincidence. The confirmation of collusion is established beyond any reasonable doubt in this single event.
you have a screen grab of that post or another thread it was mentioned?..sounds like a nice hit of hopium ..not that i havent had enough today =)
Pretty sure you'll find it in this almost 2 hour video Ultimate Q Proofs: https://www.bitchute.com/video/LHcg3CYHLGoR/
Probably in the Q/Potus deltas section at 42:02
Would also like to see this
I asked last night if we had any more proof George is legit and got this golden nugget: "if you have been following long enough, you can just tell (it's real)" Has 7 upvotes, 2 downvotes. Whats going on? Are we under attack from George shills or something? Since when do we go with gut feelings on a research board?
I’ve noticed that, too. I think people are wishful to the point of gullibility at times. I get it, I’ve been there, but I think we’d all benefit from taking a deep breath and really thinking things through before stating anything with such certainty that it can be misconstrued as factual.
I see you flipped my sentence right around. And you spent all of last night defending george with zero evidence. You are highly suspect and one of the reasons I don't trust George yet.