It's not about censoring what some shills say on a case by case basis. It's about the outright banning of specific words irregardless of context. If the N word is banned then so should Fag (which means almost every user on here including mods would probably need a ban as theres stickied Planefag posts almost daily), retards (and any variation), tranny.... the list goes on.
I dont have a problem with removing pointless and vitriolic comments from shills, in fact I encourage it, but it needs to be done after contextual review and not just because specific letters were typed next to one another.
It's not about censoring what some shills say on a case by case basis. It's about the outright banning of specific words irregardless of context. If the N word is banned then so should Fag (which means almost every user on here including mods would probably need a ban as theres stickied Planefag posts almost daily), retards (and any variation), tranny.... the list goes on.
I dont have a problem with removing pointless and vitriolic comments from shills, in fact I encourage it, but it needs to be done after contextual review and not just because specific letters were typed next to one another.
Oh, I think you’ll find I agree there.
To the point where I wagered my zillions of karma points on it.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRCJ85pI/x/c/4Dx42BbHvcm
I've said exactly the same on a previous post, stressing the importance of context.
So we can both agree that moderation is needed, but done case by case as opposed to a blanket ban policy?
Yes!
1776% Agreed!
We’re terrific!
I love the mods, but that one particular post was a well-meaning, but ill-considered turd in the otherwise delicious sherbert*-7up punch.
*shaddup, pedants. I will sooner wear a COVID cuckmask than call sherbert “sherbet”.
Well wouldya look at that, a fruitful discussion on an online forum. This place has to be graced by God, it's the only explanation. ?