I don't think he's saying that, I think he's just saying that, contrary to Q's advise/recommendation, you've been taken in by someone(s) that could be nothing but scam artists.
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm not saying that, that's my interpretation of what he said.
That said, be wary even of it being "just a chatroom"; it's a YouTube livestream if I remember correctly, isn't that a little suspicious? It should be.
Either way, just keep your head on a swivel is all I'd say. I haven't seen any sufficient proof out of them to say that they're legit; even this. As nice as the probability argument is, that's made under the assumption all verses are equally possible selections. In reality, it's a Sunday Scripture thing; he isn't going to post random verses about like "And Jesus walked through the doorway and shook hands with Simon" or something; it's pretty much guaranteed to be hand-picked for encouragement or the likes, even if Pompeo were just a normal dude and has no involvement in Q. Given that most of the encouraging one-liners are in the New Testament, I think that raises the chances of coincidence even more.
The most convincing evidence of Q for me is the prediction of McCain's death to the minute. The next most convincing ones are the endorsements by people I "trust" (To be fair, I don't FULLY trust pretty much anyone, but you know what I mean) - the Trumps and a few of the generals. Very little of the numerology or coincidences like that really do it for me; they're compelling, but their very nature is also highly subject to confirmation bias. Furthermore, circular proofs, especially for this kind of stuff, are extremely common; "we know all numbers are coded messages because Q said so, as confirmed by coded message numbers" kind of stuff.
Could George News be legit? Sure! We just don't know, and when people (not talking about you, talking other people pulling it out of their own wishful thinking without ANY coincidences or evidence) get so overly excited, and even protective, of anyone or anything that will give them hope, I get concerned.
You point out the obvious, but others here are expanding some Q posts beyond reasonable application. By their logic, even Trump taking donations is proof even he's not legit. Human nature never changes. We ignore living evidence.
I agree the tshirt shops and such are suspicious. How about the "live location" reveals. I'd imagine that would be difficult to fake. Is he legitimately hanging outside of Trump tower on the sidewalk?
Maybe they need an official presence because the money would go elsewhere. Better to donate to Trump directly than the RNC. But also, we are entering a new phase IMO, where the plan is coming more out into the open. I am just saying, let's not write George News off just yet. They should have original photos coming soon.
I respect your points about George taking donations and having the ability to not take donations at all. It's good to have some perspective in return. Perhaps we are being deceived for our greenbacks and all. You make good points about George trying to imitate Q for the sake of the deception.
But your conduct, the way you're trying to convince us that we're grossly misled with a gleeful, holier-than-thou attitude, is not going to help you persuade others to your point of view. I found that rude and disgraceful, and had I not had my own misgivings about George I would have completely dissed your point of view.
As you might see from my recent posts I have posted about George, so you may be right in thinking that I'm just trying to push hopium from the direction of George. You would be only partly right. I post about George because I too am trying to figure out who this George figure actually is, because honestly I don't know. We don't know. Are they legit? Are they snake oil salesmen? Are they Q? Are they complete outsiders? In much the same way as we treat Q, we can't conclude who this individual is or what role they are playing unless we have more evidence and data. And that is why we post, to gather information, to vet that information, and to discuss.
Please drop the gleeful holier-than-thou attitude and show a bit more respect for your fellow pedes, who may or may not know what they are talking about. And in doing so, share what you think, what you suspect, and what you know, and be prepared to defend what you believe with some respect and decorum.
If George gets Pompeo to post a scripture, as is purportedly demonstrated; I doubt your critique here and find the proof notable. I could see disputing the assertion that George was prompted as described (why don't you do that?), but I know Pompeo posted that scripture.
I don't think he's saying that, I think he's just saying that, contrary to Q's advise/recommendation, you've been taken in by someone(s) that could be nothing but scam artists.
Hey, don't shoot the messenger. I'm not saying that, that's my interpretation of what he said.
That said, be wary even of it being "just a chatroom"; it's a YouTube livestream if I remember correctly, isn't that a little suspicious? It should be.
Either way, just keep your head on a swivel is all I'd say. I haven't seen any sufficient proof out of them to say that they're legit; even this. As nice as the probability argument is, that's made under the assumption all verses are equally possible selections. In reality, it's a Sunday Scripture thing; he isn't going to post random verses about like "And Jesus walked through the doorway and shook hands with Simon" or something; it's pretty much guaranteed to be hand-picked for encouragement or the likes, even if Pompeo were just a normal dude and has no involvement in Q. Given that most of the encouraging one-liners are in the New Testament, I think that raises the chances of coincidence even more.
The most convincing evidence of Q for me is the prediction of McCain's death to the minute. The next most convincing ones are the endorsements by people I "trust" (To be fair, I don't FULLY trust pretty much anyone, but you know what I mean) - the Trumps and a few of the generals. Very little of the numerology or coincidences like that really do it for me; they're compelling, but their very nature is also highly subject to confirmation bias. Furthermore, circular proofs, especially for this kind of stuff, are extremely common; "we know all numbers are coded messages because Q said so, as confirmed by coded message numbers" kind of stuff.
Could George News be legit? Sure! We just don't know, and when people (not talking about you, talking other people pulling it out of their own wishful thinking without ANY coincidences or evidence) get so overly excited, and even protective, of anyone or anything that will give them hope, I get concerned.
When's the last time Q accepted donations? Did you say never?
It the act of accepting money that is the issue here, not the actual information passed along by george.
If they are making money it's very likely they are in it to make money.
Here's some perspective from the very first chat line.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGznL5X/in-the-very-1st-chat-line-george/c/
Well, people ignored them and sent them money anyway, so they gave up on that particular message.
What about the FBI 9/11 never before seen videos released?
You point out the obvious, but others here are expanding some Q posts beyond reasonable application. By their logic, even Trump taking donations is proof even he's not legit. Human nature never changes. We ignore living evidence.
I agree the tshirt shops and such are suspicious. How about the "live location" reveals. I'd imagine that would be difficult to fake. Is he legitimately hanging outside of Trump tower on the sidewalk?
I'm not sure about the specifics of what was done, but spoofing location data is not hard at all. It's borderline meaningless, IMO.
Maybe they need an official presence because the money would go elsewhere. Better to donate to Trump directly than the RNC. But also, we are entering a new phase IMO, where the plan is coming more out into the open. I am just saying, let's not write George News off just yet. They should have original photos coming soon.
Here's some perspective from the very first chat line.
https://greatawakening.win/p/12hRGznL5X/in-the-very-1st-chat-line-george/c/
Well, people ignored them and sent them money anyway, so they gave up on that particular message.
I respect your points about George taking donations and having the ability to not take donations at all. It's good to have some perspective in return. Perhaps we are being deceived for our greenbacks and all. You make good points about George trying to imitate Q for the sake of the deception.
But your conduct, the way you're trying to convince us that we're grossly misled with a gleeful, holier-than-thou attitude, is not going to help you persuade others to your point of view. I found that rude and disgraceful, and had I not had my own misgivings about George I would have completely dissed your point of view.
As you might see from my recent posts I have posted about George, so you may be right in thinking that I'm just trying to push hopium from the direction of George. You would be only partly right. I post about George because I too am trying to figure out who this George figure actually is, because honestly I don't know. We don't know. Are they legit? Are they snake oil salesmen? Are they Q? Are they complete outsiders? In much the same way as we treat Q, we can't conclude who this individual is or what role they are playing unless we have more evidence and data. And that is why we post, to gather information, to vet that information, and to discuss.
Please drop the gleeful holier-than-thou attitude and show a bit more respect for your fellow pedes, who may or may not know what they are talking about. And in doing so, share what you think, what you suspect, and what you know, and be prepared to defend what you believe with some respect and decorum.
If George gets Pompeo to post a scripture, as is purportedly demonstrated; I doubt your critique here and find the proof notable. I could see disputing the assertion that George was prompted as described (why don't you do that?), but I know Pompeo posted that scripture.