Not necessarily evidence one way or the other, but a point I'd like to make. I don't see the selling of merch or asking for donations as a factor to discredit them.
They are a news organization that, as far as I have seen, does not run advertisement to produce a source of income. They are also demonetized on YouTube (if I remember that correctly.)
They need a revenue source to continue running their site. I don't see that as a disqualify factor.
Crowder sells mugs anyone screaming paytriot? Cannot begrudge a person for wanting their work to yield compensation. Mark dice has merch, salty has merch, and I think it's great that they do. Far better than hiding information behind some paywall.
Not necessarily evidence one way or the other, but a point I'd like to make. I don't see the selling of merch or asking for donations as a factor to discredit them.
They are a news organization that, as far as I have seen, does not run advertisement to produce a source of income. They are also demonetized on YouTube (if I remember that correctly.)
They need a revenue source to continue running their site. I don't see that as a disqualify factor.
I agree.. People spending their time to provide information. If they are serious. They will need some type of revenue source.
Crowder sells mugs anyone screaming paytriot? Cannot begrudge a person for wanting their work to yield compensation. Mark dice has merch, salty has merch, and I think it's great that they do. Far better than hiding information behind some paywall.